These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12894938)

  • 21. Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference.
    Iyengar VK; Reeve HK; Eisner T
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):830-2. PubMed ID: 12397356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nonlinear effects of female mate choice in wild threespine sticklebacks.
    Blais J; Rico C; Bernatchez L
    Evolution; 2004 Nov; 58(11):2498-510. PubMed ID: 15612293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection.
    Brooks R; Endler JA
    Evolution; 2001 Aug; 55(8):1644-55. PubMed ID: 11580024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic and nutritional effects on male traits and reproductive performance in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Lewis SM; Tigreros N; Fedina T; Ming QL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Mar; 25(3):438-51. PubMed ID: 22239387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative genetics of natural variation of behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: the possible role of the social environment on creating persistent patterns of group activity.
    Higgins LA; Jones KM; Wayne ML
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1529-39. PubMed ID: 16153038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genotype-by-environment interactions underlie the expression of pre- and post-copulatory sexually selected traits in guppies.
    Evans JP; Rahman MM; Gasparini C
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Apr; 28(4):959-72. PubMed ID: 25818019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Condition dependence and the maintenance of genetic variance in a sexually dimorphic black scavenger fly.
    Dmitriew C; Blanckenhorn WU
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2408-19. PubMed ID: 25345564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jul; 280(1763):20130803. PubMed ID: 23698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes?
    Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Hadfield JD; Tregenza T
    Genetica; 2008 Mar; 132(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17647083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When three traits make a line: evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation through linear reaction norms in stochastic environments.
    Ergon T; Ergon R
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Mar; 30(3):486-500. PubMed ID: 27862551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.
    Zhang XS; Hill WG
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1237-44. PubMed ID: 16050100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.
    Petfield D; Chenoweth SF; Rundle HD; Blows MW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(17):6045-50. PubMed ID: 15840726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication.
    Groot AT; Horovitz JL; Hamilton J; Santangelo RG; Schal C; Gould F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Apr; 103(15):5858-63. PubMed ID: 16585529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signalling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: pyralidae).
    Collins RD; Jang Y; Reinhold K; Greenfield MD
    Heredity (Edinb); 1999 Dec; 83 ( Pt 6)():644-51. PubMed ID: 10651908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relative costs and benefits of alternative reproductive phenotypes at different temperatures - genotype-by-environment interactions in a sexually selected trait.
    Plesnar-Bielak A; Skwierzyńska AM; Hlebowicz K; Radwan J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 29996775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes.
    McLain DK
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1085-95. PubMed ID: 16136806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genetic isolation between two sympatric host-plant races of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner. I. Sex pheromone, moth emergence timing, and parasitism.
    Thomas Y; Bethenod MT; Pelozuelo L; Frérot B; Bourguet D
    Evolution; 2003 Feb; 57(2):261-73. PubMed ID: 12683523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genotype × environment interaction is weaker in genitalia than in mating signals and body traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Al-Wathiqui N
    Genetica; 2011 Jul; 139(7):871-84. PubMed ID: 21695477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evolution of wing color: male mate choice opposes adaptive wing color divergence in Colias butterflies.
    Ellers J; Boggs CL
    Evolution; 2003 May; 57(5):1100-6. PubMed ID: 12836826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.