BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12894939)

  • 1. The influence of variable rates of inbreeding on fitness, environmental responsiveness, and evolutionary potential.
    Day SB; Bryant EH; Meffert LM
    Evolution; 2003 Jun; 57(6):1314-24. PubMed ID: 12894939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing alternative methods for purging genetic load using the housefly (Musca domestica L.).
    Meffert LM; Regan JL; Hicks SK; Mukana N; Day SB
    Genetica; 2006; 128(1-3):419-27. PubMed ID: 17028969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A direct experimental test of founder-flush effects on the evolutionary potential for assortative mating.
    Regan JL; Meffert LM; Bryant EH
    J Evol Biol; 2003 Mar; 16(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 14635869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reversed selection responses in small populations of the housefly (Musca domestica L.).
    Meffert LM; Regan JL
    Genetica; 2006 May; 127(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 16850208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage.
    Reed DH; Lowe EH; Briscoe DA; Frankham R
    Evolution; 2003 Aug; 57(8):1822-8. PubMed ID: 14503623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mating patterns influence vulnerability to the extinction vortex.
    Godwin JL; Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Martin OY; Gage MJG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Aug; 26(8):4226-4239. PubMed ID: 32558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Migration or Inbreeding Followed by Selection on Low-Founder-Number Populations: Implications for Captive Breeding Programs.
    Backus VL; Bryant EH; Hughes CR; Meffert LM
    Conserv Biol; 1995 Oct; 9(5):1216-1224. PubMed ID: 34261285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evolution of the genetic load and its implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression.
    Fox CW; Scheibly KL; Reed DH
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2236-49. PubMed ID: 18564378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phenotypic correlations among fitness and its components in a population of the housefly.
    Reed DH; Bryant EH
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):919-23. PubMed ID: 15271093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterosis over a range of inbreeding coefficients.
    Pekkala N; Knott KE; Kotiaho JS; Nissinen K; Puurtinen M
    Evol Appl; 2014 Nov; 7(9):1107-19. PubMed ID: 25553071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2000 Aug; 76(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 11006636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Latter BD; Mulley JC; Reid D; Pascoe L
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):287-97. PubMed ID: 7705630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection protects against extinction.
    Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Kitson JJ; Spurgin LG; Morrison CA; Godwin JL; Dickinson ME; Martin OY; Emerson BC; Chapman T; Gage MJ
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7557):470-3. PubMed ID: 25985178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic variation predicts adaptive evolutionary responses better than population bottleneck history.
    Ørsted M; Hoffmann AA; Sverrisdóttir E; Nielsen KL; Kristensen TN
    PLoS Genet; 2019 Jun; 15(6):e1008205. PubMed ID: 31188830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intergenerational effects of inbreeding in Nicrophorus vespilloides: offspring suffer fitness costs when either they or their parents are inbred.
    Mattey SN; Strutt L; Smiseth PT
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):843-53. PubMed ID: 23442044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to selection on cold tolerance is constrained by inbreeding.
    Dierks A; Baumann B; Fischer K
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2384-98. PubMed ID: 22834739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence.
    Crnokrak P; Barrett SC
    Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2347-58. PubMed ID: 12583575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The environmental dependence of inbreeding depression in a wild bird population.
    Szulkin M; Sheldon BC
    PLoS One; 2007 Oct; 2(10):e1027. PubMed ID: 17925875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire.
    Meffert LM
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):365-74. PubMed ID: 7705637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.