These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289539)

  • 1. Load characteristics and design principles of mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants.
    Wagner JR
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1289539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ramus hinges for excessive movements of the condyles: a new dimension in mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants.
    Linkow LI; Ghalili R
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10483422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hinged tripodal subperiosteal implants for severely atrophied mandibles.
    Linkow LI
    Dent Today; 1996 Apr; 15(4):70, 72-3. PubMed ID: 9567858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The tripodial subperiosteal implant for the severely atrophic mandible.
    Wagner JR
    Dent Implantol Update; 1992 Jan; 3(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 1364302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tripodal mandibular subperiosteal implant: basic sciences, operational procedures, and clinical data.
    Linkow LI; Wagner JR; Chanavaz M
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(1):16-36. PubMed ID: 9759037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The subperiosteal implant as a viable long-term treatment modality in the severely atrophied mandible: a patient's 40-year case history.
    Kurtzman GM; Schwartz K
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 7473869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular bone growth induced by a hydroxylapatite-coated subperiosteal implant: a case report.
    Fish JM; Misch CE
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11831233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ramus frame--revisited.
    Lebowitz MS
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 8957888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The new-generation subperiosteal implant.
    Clarke JH
    J Gt Houst Dent Soc; 1992 Oct; 64(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 1288576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A maxillary subperiosteal implant design that maximizes bone support and accomodates a cemented, low-profile parallel guiding planes Hader bar.
    Nordquist WD; Naisbitt D
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 8699523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical applications of synthetic bone in dentistry, Part II: Periodontal and bony defects in conjunction with dental implants.
    Ashman A
    Gen Dent; 1993; 41(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 7489860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endosseous implants for total support and retention of a complete mandibular removable prosthesis.
    Smith CH
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(2):146-8. PubMed ID: 8690263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of stereolithography to subperiosteal implant manufacture.
    McAllister ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 9835835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Osseointegrated dental implants with ball attachments supporting overdentures in patients with mandibular alveolar ridge atrophy.
    Donatsky O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 8359871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Customised instrument to retract alveolar subperiosteal flap during the placement of dental implants: new technique.
    Vadepally AK
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 55(8):855-856. PubMed ID: 28844571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstruction of advanced mandibular resorption with both subperiosteal and root-form implants.
    Perry RT
    Implant Dent; 1998; 7(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 9743638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. All-on-4 treatment of highly atrophic mandible with mandibular V-4: report of 2 cases.
    Jensen OT; Adams MW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 67(7):1503-9. PubMed ID: 19531425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla.
    Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Hatano N
    Periodontol 2000; 2008; 47():162-71. PubMed ID: 18412580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.