These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289549)

  • 1. Finite element analysis (FEA) studies in 2.5-mm round bar design: the effects of bar length and material composition on bar failure.
    Bidez MW; Chen Y; McLoughlin SW; English CE
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1289549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element analysis of two-abutment Hader bar designs.
    Bidez MW; McLoughlin SW; Chen Y; English CE
    Implant Dent; 1993 SUM; 2(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 8242013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of four-abutment Hader bar designs.
    Bidez MW; Chen Y; McLoughlin SW; English CE
    Implant Dent; 1993; 2(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8142936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of stress distribution in overdenture-retaining bar with different levels of vertical misfit.
    Spazzin AO; Abreu RT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21658152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis and comparison of stress distribution in overdentures supported with bar attachments and telescopic crowns.
    Pan S; Yin Y; Feng H
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10557179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of horizontal misfit and bar framework material on the stress distribution of an overdenture-retaining bar system: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Spazzin AO; Dos Santos MB; Sobrinho LC; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 21973281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of material of overdenture-retaining bar with vertical misfit on three-dimensional stress distribution.
    Abreu RT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 20546493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved retention of anterior cantilever resin-bonded prostheses by design alteration: an experimental and finite element study.
    Bhakta S; van Noort R; Cardew G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 16543018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
    Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems.
    Botega DM; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):884-9. PubMed ID: 15369470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Cross-Section Design and Vertical Misfit on Stress Distribution in Overdenture Retaining System: 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Nogueira MCF; Bacchi A; Mesquita MF; Santos MBF; Consani RLX
    Implant Dent; 2018 Aug; 27(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 29944484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.