These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289550)

  • 1. Short-term plasma-cleaning treatments enhance in vitro osteoblast attachment to titanium.
    Swart KM; Keller JC; Wightman JP; Draughn RA; Stanford CM; Michaels CM
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 1289550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reuse of healing abutments: an in vitro model of plasma cleaning and common sterilization techniques.
    Vezeau PJ; Keller JC; Wightman JP
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(3):236-46. PubMed ID: 11307410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Sammons RL; Lumbikanonda N; Gross M; Cantzler P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 16307572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surface topography of titanium on surface chemistry and cellular response.
    Ong JL; Prince CW; Raikar GN; Lucas LC
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9081579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporotic-like conditions on osteoblast cell attachment to implant surface microtopographies.
    Cho P; Schneider GB; Kellogg B; Zaharias R; Keller JC
    Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):377-85. PubMed ID: 17172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro periodontal ligament fibroblast attachment to plasma-cleaned titanium surfaces.
    Michaels CM; Keller JC; Stanford CM
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 1811064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro.
    Bowers KT; Keller JC; Randolph BA; Wick DG; Michaels CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 1289255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
    Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces.
    Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics.
    Lumbikanonda N; Sammons R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizations of titanium implant surfaces. III.
    Keller JC; Stanford CM; Wightman JP; Draughn RA; Zaharias R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Aug; 28(8):939-46. PubMed ID: 7983092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of lipopolysaccharide contamination on the attachment of osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy in vitro.
    Nouneh RA; Wataha JC; Hanes PJ; Lockwood PE
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 12500875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cell behavior related to implant surfaces with different microstructure and chemical composition: an in vitro analysis.
    Conserva E; Lanuti A; Menini M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1099-107. PubMed ID: 21197485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 2. In vitro experiments.
    Cassinelli C; Morra M; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 12608668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Osteoblast attachment on titanium disks after laser irradiation.
    Romanos G; Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 16634493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early tissue reaction at the interface of immediately loaded dental implants.
    Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Fillies T; Joos U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):489-99. PubMed ID: 12938999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone cell expression on titanium surfaces is altered by sterilization treatments.
    Stanford CM; Keller JC; Solursh M
    J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1061-71. PubMed ID: 8006233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation.
    Sader MS; Balduino A; Soares Gde A; Borojevic R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 16307573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary comparison of mineralizing multilayer cultures formed by primary fetal bovine mandibular osteoblasts grown on titanium, hydroxyapatite, and glass substrates.
    Yliheikkilä PK; Masuda T; Ambrose WW; Suggs CA; Felton DA; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 8803341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different titanium surfaces modulate the bone phenotype of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells.
    Postiglione L; Di Domenico G; Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Di Meglio F; Montagnani S
    Eur J Histochem; 2004; 48(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 15590412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.