These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12896853)

  • 1. Assessment of potential risk levels associated with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference values.
    Castorina R; Woodruff TJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1318-25. PubMed ID: 12896853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The EPC approach to estimating safety from exposure to environmental chemicals.
    Williams CA; Jones HD; Freeman RW; Wernke MJ; Williams PL; Roberts SM; James RC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 1):259-80. PubMed ID: 7724834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of ATSDR's MRL and EPA's RfCs/RfDs: Similarities, Differences, and Rationales.
    Przybyla J; Buser MC; Abadin HG; Pohl HR
    J Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 4(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 37384327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD).
    Gaylor DW; Aylward LL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Aug; 40(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15265602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the EPC approach to develop health-based soil and water screening concentrations for environmental chemicals.
    Williams CA; James RC; Freeman RW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 7494905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of probabilistic methods to address variability and uncertainty in estimating risks for non-cancer health effects.
    Nielsen GH; Heiger-Bernays WJ; Levy JI; White RF; Axelrad DA; Lam J; Chartres N; Abrahamsson DP; Rayasam SDG; Shaffer RM; Zeise L; Woodruff TJ; Ginsberg GL
    Environ Health; 2023 Jan; 21(Suppl 1):129. PubMed ID: 36635712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A straw man proposal for a quantitative definition of the RfD.
    Hattis D; Baird S; Goble R
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 2002 Nov; 25(4):403-36. PubMed ID: 12378950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of PBTK model and biomarker based estimates of the internal dosimetry of acrylamide.
    DeWoskin RS; Sweeney LM; Teeguarden JG; Sams R; Vandenberg J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Aug; 58():506-21. PubMed ID: 23707562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health assessment of phosgene: approaches for derivation of reference concentration.
    Gift JS; McGaughy R; Singh DV; Sonawane B
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jun; 51(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 18440110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using human data to protect the public's health.
    Dourson ML; Andersen ME; Erdreich LS; MacGregor JA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Apr; 33(2):234-56. PubMed ID: 11350206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple procedure for estimating pseudo risk ratios from exposure to non-carcinogenic chemical mixtures.
    Scinicariello F; Portier C
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Mar; 90(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 25667015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US EPA's acute reference exposure methodology for acute inhalation exposures.
    Strickland JA; Foureman GL
    Sci Total Environ; 2002 Apr; 288(1-2):51-63. PubMed ID: 12013548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An alternative to the USEPA's proposed inhalation reference concentrations for hexavalent and trivalent chromium.
    Finley BL; Proctor DM; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1992 Oct; 16(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 1438996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is PM more toxic than the sum of its parts? Risk-assessment toxicity factors vs. PM-mortality "effect functions".
    Valberg PA
    Inhal Toxicol; 2004; 16 Suppl 1():19-29. PubMed ID: 15204790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derivation of a bisphenol A oral reference dose (RfD) and drinking-water equivalent concentration.
    Willhite CC; Ball GL; McLellan CJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2008 Feb; 11(2):69-146. PubMed ID: 18188738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.
    Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):137-41. PubMed ID: 12051999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proposal for a revised Reference Concentration (RfC) for manganese based on recent epidemiological studies.
    Bailey LA; Goodman JE; Beck BD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 55(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19686793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction.
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Mar; 59(5-6):281-526. PubMed ID: 10742829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for reference dose and reference concentration estimation for acetone.
    Gentry PR; Covington TR; Clewell HJ; Anderson ME
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2003 Dec; 66(23):2209-25. PubMed ID: 14612334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.