These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12897469)

  • 21. Design and evaluation of the FlexiCore metal-on-metal intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Valdevit A; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):276S-288S. PubMed ID: 15541677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
    Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The role of artificial disc replacement in restoring lumbar segment motion and intervertebral height].
    Liu SL; Huang DS; Liang AJ; Ye W; Li CH; Ma RF
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 15808075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement.
    Yaszay B; Bendo JA; Goldstein JA; Quirno M; Spivak JM; Errico TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):508-12; discussion 513. PubMed ID: 18317194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lumbar spinal arthroplasty: analysis of one center's twenty best and twenty worst clinical outcomes.
    Guyer RD; Siddiqui S; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Blumenthal SL; Sachs BL; Hochschuler SH; Rashbaum RF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2566-9. PubMed ID: 18941428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Functional evaluation of the cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement].
    Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; Han X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 18785527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
    Stieber JR; Donald GD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Feb; 19(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16462220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adapting innovative motion-preserving technology to spinal surgical practice: what should we expect to happen?
    Polly DW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S104-9. PubMed ID: 14560181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparative study of short-term results between total artificial disc prosthesis and anterior lumbar interbody fusion].
    Moreno P; Boulot J
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 18456064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of results of total disc replacement in postdiscectomy patients versus patients with no previous lumbar surgery.
    Leahy M; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Rashbaum RF; Sachs BL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):1690-3; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 18580740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Motion preservation technologies: alternatives to spinal fusion.
    Singh K; An HS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Sep; 35(9):411-6. PubMed ID: 17036776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lumbar intervertebral disc prosthesis. An experimental study.
    Hou TS; Tu KY; Xu YK; Li ZB; Cai AH; Wang HC
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1991 May; 104(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 1908762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intervertebral disc properties: challenges for biodevices.
    Costi JJ; Freeman BJ; Elliott DM
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2011 May; 8(3):357-76. PubMed ID: 21542708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Artificial disc replacement. Preliminary report with a 3-year minimum follow-up.
    Enker P; Steffee A; Mcmillin C; Keppler L; Biscup R; Miller S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Jun; 18(8):1061-70. PubMed ID: 8367774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Intervertebral disk endoprosthesis--development and current status].
    Büttner-Janz K; Schellnack K
    Beitr Orthop Traumatol; 1990 Mar; 37(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 2198019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Materials and design concepts for an intervertebral disc spacer. I. fiber-reinforced composite design.
    Langrana NA; Parsons JR; Lee CK; Vuono-Hawkins M; Yang SW; Alexander H
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 10172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Artificial intervertebral disc replacement for symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    ECRI Institute
    OR Manager; 2009 Sep; 25(9):4 p following 16. PubMed ID: 19813455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bartels RH; Donk R; Verbeek AL
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Jun; 66(6):1153-60; discussion 1160. PubMed ID: 20421840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice.
    Jonker BP
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Nov; 67(5):E1472-3; author reply E1473. PubMed ID: 20871430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.