These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12897594)

  • 1. Methodologic issues in observational studies.
    Hartz A; Marsh JL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):33-42. PubMed ID: 12897594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding.
    Lu CY
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 May; 63(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 19392919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpreting the term selection bias in medical research.
    Mark DH
    Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9048175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical issues in longitudinal and observational studies: purpose, short versus long term, selection of study instruments, methods, outcomes, and biases.
    Wolfe F
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Feb; 26(2):469-72. PubMed ID: 9972989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in research.
    Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Issues in the planning and conduct of non-randomised studies.
    Audigé L; Hanson B; Kopjar B
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16483576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 4: observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(1):73-108. PubMed ID: 19165298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Biases in meta-analysis].
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Sillero-Arenas M
    Med Clin (Barc); 1999; 112 Suppl 1():43-50. PubMed ID: 10618799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The regression effect as a neglected source of bias in nonrandomized intervention trials and systematic reviews of observational studies.
    Weeks DL
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):254-65. PubMed ID: 17693618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal structural models might overcome confounding when analyzing multiple treatment effects in observational studies.
    Suarez D; Haro JM; Novick D; Ochoa S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 18471655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why results of clinical trials and observational studies of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy differ: methodological and interpretive issues.
    Wolfe F; Michaud K; Dewitt EM
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Nov; 63 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii13-ii17. PubMed ID: 15479864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice.
    Morton LM; Cahill J; Hartge P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 163(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 16339049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principles of drug literature evaluation for observational study designs.
    Shields KM; DiPietro NA; Kier KL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2011 Feb; 31(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 21275490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
    Ioannidis JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.