These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12897594)

  • 21. Guidelines were developed for data collection from medical records for use in retrospective analyses.
    Jansen AC; van Aalst-Cohen ES; Hutten BA; Büller HR; Kastelein JJ; Prins MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 15718116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New strategies are needed to improve the accuracy of influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates among seniors.
    Nelson JC; Jackson ML; Weiss NS; Jackson LA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):687-94. PubMed ID: 19124221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.
    Harris IA; Mourad MS; Kadir A; Solomon MJ; Young JM
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 16768761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.
    Klungel OH; Martens EP; Psaty BM; Grobbee DE; Sullivan SD; Stricker BH; Leufkens HG; de Boer A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 15617947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interpretation of observational studies.
    Jepsen P; Johnsen SP; Gillman MW; Sørensen HT
    Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):956-60. PubMed ID: 15253985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Propensity score analysis in observational studies: outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Johnson ML; Bush RL; Collins TC; Lin PH; Liles DR; Henderson WG; Khuri SF; Petersen LA
    Am J Surg; 2006 Sep; 192(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 16920428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methodologic challenges to studying patient safety and comparative effectiveness.
    Strom BL
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S13-5. PubMed ID: 17909371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studies.
    Sørensen HT; Lash TL; Rothman KJ
    Hepatology; 2006 Nov; 44(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17058242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Residual confounding in observational studies.
    Ho KM
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):430; author reply 430. PubMed ID: 19164964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surgeon equipoise as an inclusion criterion for the evaluation of nonoperative versus operative treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries.
    Stadhouder A; Oner FC; Wilson KW; Vaccaro AR; Williamson OD; Verbout AJ; Verhaar JA; de Klerk LW; Buskens E
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):975-81. PubMed ID: 18261964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research.
    Tooth L; Ware R; Bain C; Purdie DM; Dobson A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 161(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 15671260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods to analyze real-world databases and registries.
    Kremers HM
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 19583553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The evaluation of treatment when center-specific selection criteria vary with respect to patient risk.
    DeLong ER; Coombs LP; Ferguson TB; Peterson ED
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):942-9. PubMed ID: 16401267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigating outcomes associated with medication use during pregnancy: a review of methodological challenges and observational study designs.
    Grzeskowiak LE; Gilbert AL; Morrison JL
    Reprod Toxicol; 2012 Jun; 33(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 22329969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Issues of research in medicine].
    Topić E
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():5-16. PubMed ID: 16526304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection.
    Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.