These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12897594)

  • 41. [Confounding variables in observational studies and their influence on obtained results].
    Moczko JA
    Przegl Lek; 2009; 66(10):857-60. PubMed ID: 20301954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):920-7. PubMed ID: 22996110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A primer in epidemiologic methodology.
    Weigler BJ
    Comp Med; 2001 Jun; 51(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 11924774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Strengthening the reliability and credibility of observational epidemiology studies by creating an Observational Studies Register.
    Swaen GM; Carmichael N; Doe J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 20643528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Bounding formulas for selection bias.
    Huang TH; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Statistical considerations for a medical data base.
    Dambrosia JM; Ellenberg JH
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 6996752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparing treatments using observational study designs: what can we do about selection bias?
    Dimick JB; Livingston EH
    Arch Surg; 2010 Oct; 145(10):927. PubMed ID: 20956759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Beware of registries for their biases.
    Yazici H
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2012; 70(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 22891998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The use of a comparability scoring system in reporting observational studies.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Smulian JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 24018308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bias in clinical research.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Wanner C; Zoccali C
    Kidney Int; 2008 Jan; 73(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17978812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessing observational studies of medical treatments.
    Hartz A; Bentler S; Charlton M; Lanska D; Butani Y; Soomro GM; Benson K
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 2():8. PubMed ID: 16137327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Statistical methods in SUPPORT.
    Harrell FE; Marcus SE; Layde PM; Broste SK; Cook EF; Wagner DP; Muhlbaier LH; Peck SL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43 Suppl():89S-98S. PubMed ID: 2254801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Design issues in cohort studies.
    Prentice RL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1995 Dec; 4(4):273-92. PubMed ID: 8745127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Beyond randomised versus observational studies.
    Concato J; Horwitz RI
    Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1660-1. PubMed ID: 15158623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Observational data bases in neurological disorders: selection bias and generalization of results.
    Ellenberg JH
    Neuroepidemiology; 1994; 13(6):268-74. PubMed ID: 7800104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Threats to validity of nonrandomized studies of postdiagnosis exposures on cancer recurrence and survival.
    Chubak J; Boudreau DM; Wirtz HS; McKnight B; Weiss NS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Oct; 105(19):1456-62. PubMed ID: 23940288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The importance of potential studies that have not existed and registration of observational data sets.
    Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(6):575-6. PubMed ID: 22871867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Call for observational studies register.
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):457-8. PubMed ID: 21447426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Analytic approaches to observational studies with treatment selection bias.
    Novikov I; Kalter-Leibovici O
    JAMA; 2007 May; 297(19):2077; auhor reply 2078. PubMed ID: 17507342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using video recording in observational research.
    Faulkner M; Lewis R; Cheung H
    Nurs Times; 2001 Aug 30-Sep 5; 97(35):32-3. PubMed ID: 11957592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.