These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12897594)
41. [Confounding variables in observational studies and their influence on obtained results]. Moczko JA Przegl Lek; 2009; 66(10):857-60. PubMed ID: 20301954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Grimes DA; Schulz KF Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):920-7. PubMed ID: 22996110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A primer in epidemiologic methodology. Weigler BJ Comp Med; 2001 Jun; 51(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 11924774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Strengthening the reliability and credibility of observational epidemiology studies by creating an Observational Studies Register. Swaen GM; Carmichael N; Doe J J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 20643528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bounding formulas for selection bias. Huang TH; Lee WC Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Statistical considerations for a medical data base. Dambrosia JM; Ellenberg JH Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 6996752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparing treatments using observational study designs: what can we do about selection bias? Dimick JB; Livingston EH Arch Surg; 2010 Oct; 145(10):927. PubMed ID: 20956759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Beware of registries for their biases. Yazici H Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2012; 70(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 22891998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The use of a comparability scoring system in reporting observational studies. Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Smulian JC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 24018308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Observational data bases in neurological disorders: selection bias and generalization of results. Ellenberg JH Neuroepidemiology; 1994; 13(6):268-74. PubMed ID: 7800104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Threats to validity of nonrandomized studies of postdiagnosis exposures on cancer recurrence and survival. Chubak J; Boudreau DM; Wirtz HS; McKnight B; Weiss NS J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Oct; 105(19):1456-62. PubMed ID: 23940288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The importance of potential studies that have not existed and registration of observational data sets. Ioannidis JP JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(6):575-6. PubMed ID: 22871867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Analytic approaches to observational studies with treatment selection bias. Novikov I; Kalter-Leibovici O JAMA; 2007 May; 297(19):2077; auhor reply 2078. PubMed ID: 17507342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Using video recording in observational research. Faulkner M; Lewis R; Cheung H Nurs Times; 2001 Aug 30-Sep 5; 97(35):32-3. PubMed ID: 11957592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]