121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289767)
1. The role of the surgical pathologist in the examination of the non-palpable breast lesion.
Leong AS; Mower GA
Pathology; 1992 Oct; 24(4):264-71. PubMed ID: 1289767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathologic correlation in mammographically directed breast biopsies.
Symonds DA; Copeland BE; Drane A; Kaplan GN; Graham RR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jan; 116(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 1734830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calcium oxalate is associated with benign breast tissue. Can we avoid biopsy?
Winston JS; Yeh IT; Evers K; Friedman AK
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Nov; 100(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 8249886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnosis and treatment of non-palpable breast lesions: from the biopsy to the microhistology results. Our experience].
de Rubeis GP; Bafile A; Mattucci S; Resta V; Vicentini R; Amicarelli I; Avitabile A; Ciccozzi A
Tumori; 2003; 89(4 Suppl):185-8. PubMed ID: 12903588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3-D histo-radiographic comparison of surgical clearances of microcalcified lesions in breast localization biopsies.
Davies JD; Sharp S; Chinyama CN; Farndon JR; Bates SP; Astley SM
J Pathol; 1997 May; 182(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 9227341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of surgery for non-palpable mammographic abnormalities.
Aitken RJ; MacDonald HL; Kirkpatrick AE; Anderson TJ; Chetty U; Forrest AP
Br J Surg; 1990 Jun; 77(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 2383738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Causes of failure in removing calcium in microcalcification-only lesions using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Gümüş H; Gümüş M; Devalia H; Mills P; Fish D; Jones P; Uyar A; Sever A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 22477646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Excisional breast biopsy and roentgenographic examination for mammographically detected microcalcification.
Prorok JJ; Trostle DR; Scarlato M; Rachman R
Am J Surg; 1983 May; 145(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 6303142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at core needle biopsy of the breast: An incidental finding or are there characteristic imaging findings?
Amos B; Chetlen A; Williams N
Breast Dis; 2016 Jan; 36(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 27177338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital imaging in the surgical detection of breast neoplasms].
Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Carli L; Cagini L
G Chir; 1993 Dec; 14(9):483-7. PubMed ID: 8167081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The preoperative marking of nonpalpable breast lesions: the technic and results].
Schmitt R; Gullotta U; Spindler-Thiele S; Keller E; Büsing CM
Rofo; 1992 Nov; 157(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 1421195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biopsy for microcalcification detected by mammography.
Roses DF; Harris MN; Gorstein F; Gumport SL
Surgery; 1980 Mar; 87(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 6244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy.
Vora SA; Wazer DE; Homer MJ
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 9169686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy.
Zuiani C; Londero V; Bestagno A; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):589-602. PubMed ID: 16437044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How thoroughly should needle localization breast biopsies be sampled for microscopic examination? A prospective mammographic/pathologic correlative study.
Owings DV; Hann L; Schnitt SJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1990 Jun; 14(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 2337206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic abnormalities and the detection of carcinoma of the breast.
Hall JA; Murphy DC; Hall BR; Hall KA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1677-80; discussion 1680-2. PubMed ID: 8317508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calcifications of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Georgian-Smith D; Lawton TJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 May; 176(5):1255-9. PubMed ID: 11312190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
