639 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12897977)
1. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.
Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound technology and dual energy X-ray densitometry in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: influence of sex and menopausal status.
Camozzi V; Lumachi F; Mantero F; Piccolo M; Luisetto G
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jul; 14(7):602-8. PubMed ID: 12730752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Bone density measurement: quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and distal radius. A comparison with dual spectrum X-ray absorptiometry].
Boyanov M; Shinkov A; Nestorova R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 Apr; 132(16):869-73. PubMed ID: 17443442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?
Knapp KM; Blake GM; Spector TD; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2004 May; 15(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 14685652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures.
Alenfeld FE; Wüster C; Funck C; Pereira-Lima JF; Fritz T; Meeder PJ; Ziegler R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 9850344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges with conventional bone densitometry in healthy postmenopausal women.
Alexandersen P; de Terlizzi F; Tankó LB; Bagger YZ; Christiansen C
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Sep; 16(9):1071-8. PubMed ID: 15719153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bone mineral density of the phalanges, lumbar spine, hip, and forearm for the assessment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Mulder JE; Michaeli D; Flaster ER; Siris E
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 11175918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility and diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasonometry of the phalanges to assess osteoporosis.
Reginster JY; Dethor M; Pirenne H; Dewe W; Albert A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Oct; 63(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 9849707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?
Jørgensen HL; Warming L; Bjarnason NH; Andersen PB; Hassager C
Clin Physiol; 2001 Jan; 21(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11168297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential effects of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density and axial transmission ultrasound measurements in cortical bone.
Knapp KM; Blake GM; Spector TD; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 12730793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound velocity through the cortex of phalanges, radius, and tibia in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device.
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Vrahoriti H; Tsagaraki I; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 12649644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 11204441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a simple clinical risk index and quantitative bone ultrasound for identifying women at increased risk of osteoporosis.
Kung AW; Ho AY; Sedrine WB; Reginster JY; Ross PD
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Sep; 14(9):716-21. PubMed ID: 12897978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness.
Prevrhal S; Fuerst T; Fan B; Njeh C; Hans D; Uffmann M; Srivastav S; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
