These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12898581)

  • 1. Multipoint and single point non-parametric linkage analysis with imperfect data.
    Sullivan PF; Neale BM; Neale MC; van den Oord E; Kendler KS
    Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet; 2003 Aug; 121B(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 12898581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing.
    Boyles AL; Scott WK; Martin ER; Schmidt S; Li YJ; Ashley-Koch A; Bass MP; Schmidt M; Pericak-Vance MA; Speer MC; Hauser ER
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 16093727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the effect of linkage disequilibrium between markers on the Type I error rate and power of nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis of two-generation and multigenerational pedigrees in the presence of missing genotype data.
    Kim Y; Duggal P; Gillanders EM; Kim H; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17685456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach.
    Kruglyak L; Daly MJ; Reeve-Daly MP; Lander ES
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Jun; 58(6):1347-63. PubMed ID: 8651312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
    Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods to map oligogenes by linkage.
    Liò P; Morton NE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 May; 94(10):5344-8. PubMed ID: 9144239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a multipoint identity-by-descent method with parametric multipoint linkage analysis for mapping quantitative traits.
    Goldgar DE; Oniki RS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Mar; 50(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 1539596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of genotyping error in sib-pair genomewide linkage scans depends crucially upon the method of analysis.
    Walters K
    J Hum Genet; 2005; 50(7):329-337. PubMed ID: 16059746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using parametric multipoint lods and mods for linkage analysis requires a shift in statistical thinking.
    Hodge SE; Baskurt Z; Strug LJ
    Hum Hered; 2011; 72(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 22189469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distribution and magnitude of type I error of model-based multipoint lod scores: implications for multipoint mod scores.
    Xing C; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):447-58. PubMed ID: 16685712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A robust multipoint linkage statistic (tlod) for mapping complex trait loci.
    Abkevich V; Camp NJ; Gutin A; Farnham JM; Cannon-Albright L; Thomas A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S492-7. PubMed ID: 11793725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis is not necessarily inherently biased.
    Visscher PM; Wray NR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):718-20; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric linkage and family-based association studies of a simulated complex disorder.
    Koller DL; Balding J; Foroud T
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S627-32. PubMed ID: 10597504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of multipoint likelihoods using flanking marker data: a simulation study.
    George AW; Mangin LA; Bartlett CW; Logue MW; Segre AM; Vieland VJ
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44. PubMed ID: 16451655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using sex-averaged genetic maps in multipoint linkage analysis when identity-by-descent status is incompletely known.
    Fingerlin TE; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):384-96. PubMed ID: 16685713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A procedure for combining two-point lod scores into a summary multipoint map.
    Curtis D; Gurling H
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(3):173-85. PubMed ID: 8330881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.