These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289867)

  • 1. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of high-copper dental amalgams with and without admixed indium.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 1524741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners.
    Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-year clinical performance of eight amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 2076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Norman RD; Gale EN
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 1812507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A basic study on gallium alloys for dental restorations. Improvement of liquid gallium alloy].
    Yada I
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 16(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 2488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of admixed indium on properties of a dispersed-phase high-copper dental amalgam.
    Johnson GH; Powell LV
    Dent Mater; 1992 Nov; 8(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 1303384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of high-copper amalgams.
    Berry TG; Osborne JS; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 8599586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in-vitro investigation of variables influencing mercury vapor release from dental amalgam.
    Neme AL; Maxson BB; Linger JB; Abbott LJ
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11817472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 3-year longitudinal, controlled clinical study of a gallium-based restorative material.
    Dunne SM; Abraham R; Pankhurst CL
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):355-9; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 15789103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct-placement gallium restorative alloy: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10323158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8008818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.