These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289867)

  • 41. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical evaluation of marginal fracture of amalgam restorations: one-year report.
    Osborne JW; Friedman SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 3457164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Copper-, indium-, tin-, and calcium-fluoride admixed amalgams: release rates and selected properties.
    Mueller HJ; Bapna MS
    Dent Mater; 1990 Oct; 6(4):256-65. PubMed ID: 2086303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A long-term clinical comparison between a lathe-cut alloy and Dispersalloy.
    Pameijer CH; Benhameurlaine M
    Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1983 May; 14(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 6579576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationship of restoration width, tooth position, and alloy to fracture at the margins of 13- to 14-year-old amalgams.
    Osborne JW; Gale EN
    J Dent Res; 1990 Sep; 69(9):1599-601. PubMed ID: 2398187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. 13-year clinical assessment of 10 amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Norman RD
    Dent Mater; 1990 Jul; 6(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 2086293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical evaluation of three amalgam alloys.
    Tyas MJ; Ewers GJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8373297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical behaviour over three years of GS-80 and Lojic+ amalgam alloys.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    Aust Dent J; 1994 Dec; 39(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 7832680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Initial mercury evaporation from amalgams made with in-containing commercial alloys.
    Nakajima H; Lorenzana E; Ferracane JL; Okabe T
    Dent Mater J; 1996 Dec; 15(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 9550014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bulk fracture of amalgam restorations--a 5-year controlled clinical trial.
    Lemmens PL; Letzel H; Peters MC; van't Hof MA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Nov; 15(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 3236124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of admixed indium on mercury vapor release from dental amalgam.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Bales DJ
    J Dent Res; 1989 Aug; 68(8):1231-3. PubMed ID: 2632609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Kiremitci A; Bolay S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Survival predictions of amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 1806592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Long-term influences on marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6585529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Semi-quantitative analysis of early microleakage around amalgam restorations by fluorescent spectrum method: a laboratory study.
    Kim JY; Takahashi Y; Kito M; Morimoto Y; Hasegawa J
    Dent Mater J; 1992 Jun; 11(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 1395486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fracture resistance of lower molars with varying faciocclusolingual amalgam restorations.
    Re GJ; Norling BK; Draheim RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 May; 47(5):518-21. PubMed ID: 6953235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stress relaxation of dental amalgam alloys.
    Huget EF; de Simon LB; Hertert RS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Jan; 12(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 632314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Creep versus marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Vrijhoef MM; Letzel H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jul; 13(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 3463718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A 30-month clinical evaluation of the influence of finishing and size of restoration on the margin performance of five amalgam alloys.
    Birtcil RF; Pelzner RB; Stark MM
    J Dent Res; 1981 Dec; 60(12):1949-56. PubMed ID: 7028822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Fracture strength of amalgam "restorations" made from different alloy particles (author's transl)].
    Pereira JC; Mondelli J
    Estomatol Cult; 1975; 9(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 1073686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.