These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12899448)

  • 1. What should the standard of proof be in scientific misconduct proceedings relating to public health service-funded research?
    Spece RG; Marchalonis J
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2003 Jun; 49(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 12899448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
    Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
    Scheetz MD
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.
    Tong EK; England L; Glantz SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e356-66. PubMed ID: 15741361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement.
    Koppelman-White E
    Account Res; 2006; 13(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 17124759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it?
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PHS perspectives on misconduct in science.
    Brandt EN
    Public Health Rep; 1983; 98(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 6856737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality issues in clinical research and the implications on health policy (QICRHP).
    Njie VP; Thomas AC
    J Prof Nurs; 2001; 17(5):233-42. PubMed ID: 11559879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Academic and scientific misconduct: issues for nursing educators.
    Hansen BC; Hansen KD
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 7844280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
    Klein DF
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Champions of science or blacklisting bureaucrats?
    Tokarski C
    J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10116471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responsible conduct of research.
    Bivens LW
    ASHA; 1991 Sep; 33(9):34-6. PubMed ID: 1750842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention.
    Mishkin B
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is scientific misconduct, who has to (dis)prove it, and to what level of certainty?
    Spece RG; Bernstein C
    Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):493-510. PubMed ID: 17970248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.