BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12901995)

  • 1. The effect of amalgam bonding on the stiffness of teeth weakened by cavity preparation.
    Zidan O; Abdel-Keriem U
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 12901995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique.
    Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 11551017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Resistance of cavity walls of composite filled teeth].
    Fabianelli A; De Luca S; Garberoglio R
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep; 59(13):94-100, 103-4. PubMed ID: 1824368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations.
    Pilo R; Brosh T; Chweidan H
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):467-72. PubMed ID: 9699439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Barbosa WF; Mondelli J; Franco EB; Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10388373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinforcement of weakened cusps by adhesive restorative materials: an in-vitro study.
    Macpherson LC; Smith BG
    Br Dent J; 1995 May; 178(9):341-4. PubMed ID: 7766457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of bonding amalgam on the reinforcement of teeth.
    Rasheed AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15623998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 15088737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.