These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12901995)

  • 21. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
    Ausiello P; De Gee AJ; Rengo S; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique.
    Morin D; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1075-8. PubMed ID: 6379008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An in vitro investigation of the tooth strains associated with four different restorations in Class II cavity.
    Shimizu A; Hasegawa M; Kishimoto H; Yoshioka W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Sep; 76(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 8887806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams.
    Boyer DB; Roth L
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam.
    Hansen EK; Asmussen E; Christiansen NC
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1990 Apr; 6(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 2132209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Ishikiriama SK; de Oliveira Filho O; Mondelli J
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 19466244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Adhesively Restored Molar Teeth with Different MOD Cavity Dimensions.
    Forster A; Braunitzer G; Tóth M; Szabó BP; Fráter M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e325-e331. PubMed ID: 29508474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars.
    Linn J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):479-85. PubMed ID: 7714419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.
    Steele A; Johnson BR
    J Endod; 1999 Jan; 25(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10196835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E; White SN
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth.
    Joynt RB; Wieczkowski G; Klockowski R; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Apr; 57(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 3471955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of restored and unrestored non-carious cervical lesions on the fracture resistance of previously restored maxillary premolar teeth.
    Osborne-Smith KL; Burke FJ; Farlane TM; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):427-33. PubMed ID: 9699433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of bonded composites vs. amalgam on resistance to cuspal deflection for endodontically-treated premolar teeth.
    Cerutti A; Flocchini P; Madini L; Mangani F; Putignano A; Docchio F
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 15478495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.