333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12902091)
1. Bivalvular mechanical mitral-aortic valve replacement in 254 patients: long-term results--a 22-year follow-up.
Remadi JP; Baron O; Tribouilloy C; Roussel JC; Al-Habasch O; Despins P; Michaud JL; Duveau D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Aug; 76(2):487-92. PubMed ID: 12902091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twenty-five year experience with the St. Jude medical mechanical valve prosthesis.
Toole JM; Stroud MR; Kratz JM; Crumbley AJ; Bradley SM; Crawford FA; Ikonomidis JS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1402-9. PubMed ID: 20417752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: ten-year follow-up.
Bryan AJ; Rogers CA; Bayliss K; Wild J; Angelini GD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):614-22. PubMed ID: 17320553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CardiaMed mechanical valve: mid-term results of a multicenter clinical trial.
Nazarov VM; Zheleznev SI; Bogachev-Prokophiev AV; Afanasyev AV; Nemchenko EV; Jeltovskiy YV; Lavinyukov SO
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2014 Jan; 22(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 24585637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mitral and mitro-aortic valve replacement with Sorin Bicarbon valves compared with St. Jude Medical valves.
Camilleri LF; Bailly P; Legault BJ; Miguel B; D'Agrosa-Boiteux MC; de Riberolles CM
Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Jun; 9(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 11336851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes with the epicholorohydrin-modified porcine aortic heart valve: a 15-year follow-up.
Wei X; Yi W; Chen W; Ma X; Lau WB; Wang H; Yi D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1417-24. PubMed ID: 20417754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC
Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective comparative study of aortic valve replacement with St. Jude medical and medtronic-hall prostheses: a 20-year follow-up study.
Anttila V; Heikkinen J; Biancari F; Oikari K; Pokela R; Lepojärvi M; Salmela E; Juvonen T
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 Feb; 36(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12018768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair compared with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement.
Talwar S; Mathur A; Choudhary SK; Singh R; Kumar AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Oct; 84(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 17888973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients.
Peterseim DS; Cen YY; Cheruvu S; Landolfo K; Bashore TM; Lowe JE; Wolfe WG; Glower DD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 May; 117(5):890-7. PubMed ID: 10220680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term results of mitral-aortic valve operations.
Mueller XM; Tevaearai HT; Stumpe F; Fischer AP; Hurni M; Ruchat P; von Segesser LK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Jun; 115(6):1298-309. PubMed ID: 9628671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thirty-year experience with a bileaflet mechanical valve prosthesis.
Johnson S; Stroud MR; Kratz JM; Bradley SM; Crawford FA; Ikonomidis JS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 157(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 30342758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sorin Bicarbon bileaflet valve: a 9.8-year experience. Clinical performance of the prosthesis after heart valve replacement in 587 patients.
Spiliopoulos K; Haschemi A; Parasiris P; Kemkes BM
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 8(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 19022847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
