These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1290217)

  • 1. Current usage of nonionic contrast.
    Hopper KD; Lambe H; Matthews YL
    Urol Radiol; 1992; 14(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 1290217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of informed consent for ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Lambe HA; Hopper KD; Matthews YL
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 1609071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey of contrast media use in southeastern U.S. hospitals.
    Utter DP
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 9170181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-referral in private offices for imaging studies performed in Pennsylvania Blue Shield subscribers during 1991.
    Levin DC; Edmiston RB; Ricci JA; Beam LM; Rosetti GF; Harford RJ
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):371-5. PubMed ID: 8210362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intravenous use of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in children.
    Cohen MD; Smith JA
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):793-4. PubMed ID: 8184066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.
    Deitch CH; Chan WC; Sunshine JH; Zinninger MD; Cascade PN; Cochran ST
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1245-54. PubMed ID: 7976910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability of informed consent forms for use with iodinated contrast media.
    Hopper KD; Lambe HA; Shirk SJ
    Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):279-83. PubMed ID: 8451429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency and effects of extravasation of ionic and nonionic CT contrast media during rapid bolus injection.
    Federle MP; Chang PJ; Confer S; Ozgun B
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):637-40. PubMed ID: 9494479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of on-site facilities on use of diagnostic radiology by non-radiologists.
    Radecki SE; Steele JP
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Feb; 25(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 2312255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods used for liver computed tomography scanning in community radiology practice.
    Sistrom CL; Gay SB; Holder CA
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Dec; 28(12):1139-43. PubMed ID: 8307718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media: a prospective study of the effect of rapid bolus injection on nausea and anaphylactoid reactions.
    Federle MP; Willis LL; Swanson DP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 9606371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast media reactions and extravasation: relationship to intravenous injection rates.
    Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Langlotz CP
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):411-6. PubMed ID: 9807567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spiral CT with ionic and nonionic contrast material: evaluation of patient motion and scan quality.
    Stockberger SM; Hicklin JA; Liang Y; Wass JL; Ambrosius WT
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 9494478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial bolus curve after intravenous injection of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Gmelin E; Rinast E; Ollrogge C
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():67-9. PubMed ID: 2568811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergency department contrast practices for abdominal/pelvic computed tomography-a national survey and comparison with the american college of radiology appropriateness criteria(®).
    Broder JS; Hamedani AG; Liu SW; Emerman CL
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 44(2):423-33. PubMed ID: 23164558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current use of low-osmolality contrast agents: results of a survey.
    Bettmann MA; Geller SC; McClennan B; Dunnick NR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):1079-83. PubMed ID: 2801427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.
    Yamaguchi K; Katayama H; Takashima T; Kozuka T; Seez P; Matsuura K
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 1987594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Adverse reactions to contrast media for intravenous use. A comparison between ionic and nonionic media].
    Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; Rodríguez R
    Rev Med Panama; 1995; 20(1-2):20-4. PubMed ID: 7480899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corticosteroid prophylaxis for patients with increased risk of adverse reactions to intravascular contrast agents: a survey of current practice in the UK.
    Seymour R; Halpin SF; Hardman JA; Coote JM; Ruttley MS; Roberts GM
    Clin Radiol; 1994 Nov; 49(11):791-5. PubMed ID: 7955846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient choice and nonionic contrast media.
    Hopper KD; Matthews YL
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Apr; 28(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 8478170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.