These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12902951)

  • 1. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion.
    Zigler JE; Burd TA; Vialle EN; Sachs BL; Rashbaum RF; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):352-61. PubMed ID: 12902951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II.
    Zigler JE
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S. PubMed ID: 15541675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.
    Tropiano P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Marnay T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 12902952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
    Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2230-6. PubMed ID: 16205353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study.
    Zigler JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S163-6. PubMed ID: 14560187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center.
    McAfee PC; Fedder IL; Saiedy S; Shucosky EM; Cunningham BW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 12902960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Chung SS; Lee CS; Kang CS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Aug; 19(6):411-5. PubMed ID: 16891976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
    Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of patients who have undergone 1-Level versus 2-Level ProDisc arthroplasty: a prospective study with minimum of 5-year follow-up.
    Yue J; Zhang K; Bai HX; Du J; Cammisa F; Abjornson C; Mo F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):1194-8. PubMed ID: 23392415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial.
    Delamarter RB; Fribourg DM; Kanim LE; Bae H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S167-75. PubMed ID: 14560188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial disc replacement with the PDN prosthetic disc nucleus device: early clinical results.
    Shim CS; Lee SH; Park CW; Choi WC; Choi G; Choi WG; Lim SR; Lee HY
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 12902947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.