These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12904490)

  • 1. Neuromotor noise limits motor performance, but not motor adaptation, in children.
    Takahashi CD; Nemet D; Rose-Gottron CM; Larson JK; Cooper DM; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):703-11. PubMed ID: 12904490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple motor learning experiences enhance motor adaptability.
    Seidler RD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 15006037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aging and motor variability: a test of the neural noise hypothesis.
    Sosnoff JJ; Newell KM
    Exp Aging Res; 2011 Jul; 37(4):377-97. PubMed ID: 21800971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning.
    Davidson PR; Wolpert DM
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 370(2-3):102-7. PubMed ID: 15488303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor learning in children: feedback effects on skill acquisition.
    Sullivan KJ; Kantak SS; Burtner PA
    Phys Ther; 2008 Jun; 88(6):720-32. PubMed ID: 18339797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments?
    Karniel A; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    Biol Cybern; 2003 Jul; 89(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 12836029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.
    van Beers RJ
    Neuron; 2009 Aug; 63(3):406-17. PubMed ID: 19679079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuroanatomical correlates of motor acquisition and motor transfer.
    Seidler RD; Noll DC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 99(4):1836-45. PubMed ID: 18272874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.
    Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I; Bonduelle M; Barnes J; Nekkebroeck J; Loft A; Wennerholm UB; Tarlatzis BC; Peters C; Hagberg BS; Berner A; Sutcliffe AG
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e283-9. PubMed ID: 15741353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.
    Franklin DW; Osu R; Burdet E; Kawato M; Milner TE
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3270-82. PubMed ID: 14615432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primitives for motor adaptation reflect correlated neural tuning to position and velocity.
    Sing GC; Joiner WM; Nanayakkara T; Brayanov JB; Smith MA
    Neuron; 2009 Nov; 64(4):575-89. PubMed ID: 19945398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of force adaptation during childhood.
    Konczak J; Jansen-Osmann P; Kalveram KT
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Mar; 35(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 12724098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification.
    Emken JL; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Mar; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15813404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motor imagery facilitates force field learning.
    Anwar MN; Tomi N; Ito K
    Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 1395():21-9. PubMed ID: 21555118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lack of adaptation to random conflicting force fields of variable magnitude.
    Gupta R; Ashe J
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 97(1):738-45. PubMed ID: 17093124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice.
    Gentili R; Papaxanthis C; Pozzo T
    Neuroscience; 2006 Feb; 137(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 16338093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential effects of age on sequence learning and sensorimotor adaptation.
    Seidler RD
    Brain Res Bull; 2006 Oct; 70(4-6):337-46. PubMed ID: 17027769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues.
    Krouchev NI; Kalaska JF
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Feb; 89(2):1165-75. PubMed ID: 12574490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor learning in children with spina bifida: intact learning and performance on a ballistic task.
    Dennis M; Jewell D; Edelstein K; Brandt ME; Hetherington R; Blaser SE; Fletcher JM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Sep; 12(5):598-608. PubMed ID: 16961941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.
    Tseng YW; Diedrichsen J; Krakauer JW; Shadmehr R; Bastian AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 98(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17507504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.