177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12904677)
1. The recovery of the density scale using a stochastic quasi-realization of additive conjoint measurement.
Pelton TW; Bunderson CV
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 12904677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analyzing nonadditive conjoint structures: compounding events by Rasch model probabilities.
Karabatsos G
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(3):191-221. PubMed ID: 9711021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.
Wang WC
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conditional pairwise estimation in the Rasch model for ordered response categories using principal components.
Andrich D; Luo G
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):205-21. PubMed ID: 12904672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets.
Mallinson T; Stelmack J; Velozo C
Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I17-24. PubMed ID: 14707752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
Marques TA
Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and true-score measures of binary items as a function of their Rasch difficulty parameter.
Dimitrov DM
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):222-33. PubMed ID: 12904673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Substantive scale construction.
Stone MH
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):282-97. PubMed ID: 12904678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
Seol H
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.
Mallinson T
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 17700332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding Rasch measurement: estimation methods for Rasch measures.
Linacre JM
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(4):382-405. PubMed ID: 10572388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
Ferrando PJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Random parameter structure and the testlet model: extension of the Rasch testlet model.
Paek I; Yon H; Wilson M; Kang T
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):394-407. PubMed ID: 19934527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding the unit in the Rasch model.
Humphry SM; Andrich D
J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 18753694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
Smith RM; Plackner C
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
Wolfe EW
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Item set discrimination and the unit in the Rasch model.
Humphry S
J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 22805360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of stochastic measurement models to visual function rating scale questionnaires.
Massof RW
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):103-24. PubMed ID: 16019693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Monte Carlo study of the impact of missing data and differential item functioning on theta estimates from two polytomous Rasch family models.
Furlow CF; Fouladi RT; Gagne P; Whittaker TA
J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):388-403. PubMed ID: 18250525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
