116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1290604)
1. Microleakage of a composite inlay system.
Scott JA; Saunders WP; Strang R
Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 1290604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of composite resin placement and use of an unfilled resin on the microleakage of two dentin bonding agents.
Saunders WP; Strang R; Ahmad I
Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 2076240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth.
Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Hembree JH; Puckett AD
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):230-5. PubMed ID: 8710704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents.
Alavi AA; Kianimanesh N
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11817466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
Stritikus J; Owens B
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites.
Civelek A; Ersoy M; L'Hotelier E; Soyman M; Say EC
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations.
Woody TL; Davis RD
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):175-80. PubMed ID: 1289863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
