309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12906189)
1. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
Samei E
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
Samei E; Flynn MJ
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors.
Ghetti C; Borrini A; Ortenzia O; Rossi R; Ordóñez PL
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 18383665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency in digital detectors consistent with the IEC 62220-1 standard: practical considerations regarding the choice of filter material.
Ranger NT; Samei E; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2305-11. PubMed ID: 16121586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of DQE dependence with beam quality on GE essential mammography flat panel.
García-Mollá R; Linares R; Ayala R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3176. PubMed ID: 21330969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
