383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12906192)
1. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
Samei E
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
Samei E; Flynn MJ
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
Samei E; Flynn MJ
Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 11991117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of a clinical unit for digital radiography based on irradiation side sampling technology.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Burani A
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101902. PubMed ID: 24089904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement.
Liu X; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 14761026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
Gomi T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
