These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12906194)

  • 1. Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors.
    Rong XJ; Krugh KT; Shepard SJ; Geiser WR
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1768-75. PubMed ID: 12906194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of testing of collimator and beam alignment, focal spot size with slit camera, and tube current consistency using computed radiography and conventional screen-film systems.
    Meechai T; Chousangsuntorn K; Owasirikul W; Mongkolsuk M; Iampa W
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):160-169. PubMed ID: 31095873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Focal-spot measurement: comparison of slit, pinhole, and star resolution pattern techniques.
    Everson JD; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):261-4. PubMed ID: 3628780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Measurement of focal spot in X-ray tube using imaging plate].
    Abe S; Negishi T; Fukaya M; Akiyama T; Noguchi M; Fujisaki T; Monma M; Saitoh H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Aug; 60(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 15389171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
    Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement.
    Liu X; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 14761026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A CMOS image sensor method of focal spot size measurement.
    Tuchyna T; Paix D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 27(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 15462588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency in digital detectors consistent with the IEC 62220-1 standard: practical considerations regarding the choice of filter material.
    Ranger NT; Samei E; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2305-11. PubMed ID: 16121586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focal spot measurements using a digital flat panel detector.
    Jain A; Panse A; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2014 Mar; 9033(90335F):. PubMed ID: 25302004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. X-ray focal spot reconstruction by circular penumbra analysis-Application to digital radiography systems.
    Di Domenico G; Cardarelli P; Contillo A; Taibi A; Gambaccini M
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):294. PubMed ID: 26745922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanning-slit photon counting x-ray imaging system using a microchannel plate detector.
    Shikhaliev PM; Xu T; Le H; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1061-71. PubMed ID: 15191293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slit camera focal spot measurement errors in mammography.
    Tang S; Barnes GT; Tanner RL
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1803-14. PubMed ID: 8587535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study.
    Ning R; Tang X; Conover D; Yu R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1694-705. PubMed ID: 12906186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.