These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12906198)

  • 1. Integrated density of a lesion: a quantitative, mammographically derived, invariable measure.
    Chang YH; Good WF; Leader JK; Wang XH; Zheng B; Hardesty LA; Hakim CM; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1805-11. PubMed ID: 12906198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density.
    Shepherd JA; Herve L; Landau J; Fan B; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1490-8. PubMed ID: 16752583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
    Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass density images from the diffraction enhanced imaging technique.
    Hasnah MO; Parham C; Pisano ED; Zhong Z; Oltulu O; Chapman D
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):549-52. PubMed ID: 15789601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
    Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
    Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
    Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative measures confirm the inverse relationship between lesion spiculation and detection of breast masses.
    Rawashdeh MA; Bourne RM; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Borecky N; Brennan PC
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):576-80. PubMed ID: 23477828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved location features for linkage of regions across ipsilateral mammograms.
    Tanner C; van Schie G; Lesniak JM; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1265-72. PubMed ID: 23731758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
    Gupta S; Markey MK
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
    Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary results.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Suzuki K; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Newstead GM; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2295-304. PubMed ID: 16121585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.