These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12906198)

  • 21. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of breast density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry with mammographic density among adult women in Hawaii.
    Maskarinec G; Morimoto Y; Daida Y; Laidevant A; Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Novotny R
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 35(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 20688593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.
    Molloi S; Ding H; Feig S
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):1052-9. PubMed ID: 26031229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 12852535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images.
    Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Wu T; Rafferty EA; Moore R; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91. PubMed ID: 16532956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer?
    Colin C; Prince V; Valette PJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 20133095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views.
    van Engeland S; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images.
    Metheany KG; Abbey CK; Packard N; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4685-94. PubMed ID: 18975714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and evaluation of a case-based reasoning classifier for prediction of breast biopsy outcome with BI-RADS lexicon.
    Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2090-100. PubMed ID: 12349930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated effect-specific mammographic pattern measures.
    Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Tanko LB; Nielsen M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Aug; 27(8):1054-60. PubMed ID: 18672423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
    The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
    Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.