390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12906208)
1. A systematic study of imaging uncertainties and their impact on 125I prostate brachytherapy dose evaluation.
Lindsay PE; Van Dyk J; Battista JJ
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1897-908. PubMed ID: 12906208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy.
Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate post-implant dosimetry: interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion.
De Brabandere M; Hoskin P; Haustermans K; Van den Heuvel F; Siebert FA
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Aug; 104(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 22857857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: seed orientation and the impact of dosimetric anisotropy in stranded implants.
Chng N; Spadinger I; Rasoda R; Morris WJ; Salcudean S
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):721-31. PubMed ID: 22320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose uncertainty due to computed tomography (CT) slice thickness in CT-based high dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Hsu IC; Lessard E; Pouliot J; Vujic J
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2543-8. PubMed ID: 15487736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants.
Chibani O; Williamson JF; Todor D
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2557-66. PubMed ID: 16193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric impact of contouring and needle reconstruction uncertainties in US-, CT- and MRI-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Rylander S; Buus S; Pedersen EM; Bentzen L; Tanderup K
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Apr; 123(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 28284493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of selection of post-implant technique on dosimetry parameters for permanent prostate implants.
Haworth A; Ebert M; St Clair S; Carey BM; Flynn A; Bottomley DM; Duchesne GM; Joseph D; Ash D
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 15893269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate brachytherapy seed localization by analysis of multiple projections: identifying and addressing the seed overlap problem.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Herman MG; Robb RA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1277-87. PubMed ID: 15191320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the dose distribution for prostate implants using various 125I and 103Pd sources.
Meigooni AS; Luerman CM; Sowards KT
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1452-8. PubMed ID: 19472652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of edema, relative biological effectiveness, and dose heterogeneity on prostate brachytherapy.
Wang JZ; Mayr NA; Nag S; Montebello J; Gupta N; Samsami N; Kanellitsas C
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1025-32. PubMed ID: 16696479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT- and MRI-based seed localization in postimplant evaluation after prostate brachytherapy.
De Brabandere M; Al-Qaisieh B; De Wever L; Haustermans K; Kirisits C; Moerland MA; Oyen R; Rijnders A; Van den Heuvel F; Siebert FA
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 23876358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of HDR interstitial breast implants planned by conventional and optimized CT-based dosimetry systems with respect to dose homogeneity and conformality.
Major T; Fodor J; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Agoston P; Polgár C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15702297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of combined x-ray radiography and magnetic resonance (XMR) imaging-versus computed tomography-based dosimetry for the evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy implants.
Acher P; Rhode K; Morris S; Gaya A; Miquel M; Popert R; Tham I; Nichol J; McLeish K; Deehan C; Dasgupta P; Beaney R; Keevil SF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1518-25. PubMed ID: 18513881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity of low energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition.
Landry G; Reniers B; Murrer L; Lutgens L; Gurp EB; Pignol JP; Keller B; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5188-98. PubMed ID: 21089752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose escalation in permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer: dosimetric and biological considerations.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Stewart RD; DiBiase SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2753-65. PubMed ID: 14516099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
