These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12908204)
1. Legal issues in quality of care oversight in the United States: recent developments. Jost TS Eur J Health Law; 2003 Mar; 10(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 12908204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Home health care agencies: Part 1--Liability and risk management issues. Karcher K QRC Advis; 1994 Jul; 10(9):4, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10135899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Communication: the key to avoiding query and reporting standards violations. Shlala T; Holloway P J Healthc Qual; 1993; 15(3):15-21. PubMed ID: 10125966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. President's column ... testimony to the Subcommittee on Health, House Ways and Means Committee on February 1, 1994. O'Leary DS Jt Comm Perspect; 1994; 14(2):2-3 contd. PubMed ID: 10136127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical liability system hinders improvements in patient safety: Joint Commission expert panel offers solutions to crisis. Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 May; 25(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 15969300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The emerging trend of corporate liability: courts' uneven treatment of hospital standards leaves hospitals uncertain and exposed. Rutchik DH Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Feb; (192):9-45. PubMed ID: 10144587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical peer review in the United States: history, legal development and subsequent abuse. Vyas D; Hozain AE World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 20(21):6357-63. PubMed ID: 24914357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meeting the peer review challenge. Waxman JM Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 10113815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--boon or bane? Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Feb; 3(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 2980922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New JCAH standard: legal perils of compliance. Sussman DL; Roach C Hosp Risk Manage; 1980 Jan; 2(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 10289265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antitrust's recent attack on the peer review practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy? Rifkin AM; Evans GE; Hall GD Md Med J; 1990 Jan; 39(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 2308484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctors in the executive suite: should the U.S. and U.K. be putting M.D. licensure at risk for shortfalls in institutional quality of care? Miller FH J Health Law; 1998; 31(3):217-39. PubMed ID: 10620830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of regulation in quality improvement. Brennan TA Milbank Q; 1998; 76(4):709-31, 512. PubMed ID: 9879308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process. Hammack JM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. They just don't get it. Hackney VH; Le Grand AC Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New JCAHO challenge: sentinel event reporting. Bombard C Nurs Spectr (Wash D C); 1998 Apr; 8(8):10. PubMed ID: 10542712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Austin v. McNamara: antitrust immunity for peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Herzog JP; Fisher DR Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10183844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]