1737 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12908218)
21. Malpractice reform now.
Ignagni K
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):7. PubMed ID: 12675001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Perspectives. Bush pushes catastrophic, individual coverage, med-mal caps.
Med Health; 2004 Jan; 58(4):1, 7-8. PubMed ID: 14959567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Tort reform battle captured in AMS video.
Zeno ZL
J Ark Med Soc; 2003 Jul; 100(1):6, 12. PubMed ID: 12874928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Med malaise. Backers of strict malpractice liability limits ignore real solutions to insurance crisis.
Sloane T
Mod Healthc; 2004 May; 34(21):17. PubMed ID: 15202219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Tort reform 2004. The legislative perspective.
Brown AG
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 15227949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Malpractice crisis and reform.
Bovbjerg RR
Clin Perinatol; 2005 Mar; 32(1):203-33, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 15777830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Malpractice reform is dead; long live malpractice reform.
Scott JS
Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Sep; 57(9):32-4. PubMed ID: 14503140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Tort reform in medical malpractice.
Regan J; Hamer G; Wright A; White C
Tenn Med; 2004 Jul; 97(7):322-3. PubMed ID: 15359522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Administrative compensation of medical injuries: a hardy perennial blooms again.
Barringer PJ; Studdert DM; Kachalia AB; Mello MM
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Aug; 33(4):725-60. PubMed ID: 18617673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical tort reform: a novel approach.
Hancock CR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):829-31. PubMed ID: 17412179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Insurance. California, here we come.
Haugh R
Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Oct; 76(10):16, 18, 4. PubMed ID: 12416453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical malpractice and tort reform. Issue brief.
Health Policy Tracking Service, A Service of Thomson Reuters/West
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2011 Jan; ():1-26. PubMed ID: 21374836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes.
Dwyer CL
Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical malpractice and tort reform.
; Berry MD
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-33. PubMed ID: 22413190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. MSMS efforts to preserve Michigan's tort reform are paying off.
Madigan WE; Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2004; 103(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 14986520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The malpractice liability crisis, part 2: moving toward workable solutions.
Smith JJ; Brenner RJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 17411575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. State liability reform trends: caps up, alternatives abound.
Sutton JH
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2004 Nov; 89(11):17-20. PubMed ID: 18435043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Debunking medical malpractice myths: unraveling the false premises behind "tort reform".
Boehm G
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 15742581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform.
Stewart RM; Geoghegan K; Myers JG; Sirinek KR; Corneille MG; Mueller D; Dent DL; Wolf SE; Pruitt BA
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Apr; 212(4):463-7, 467.e1-42; discussion 467-9. PubMed ID: 21463769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What hope is there for meaningful tort reform to stop another malpractice crisis?
Henley E
J Fam Pract; 2006 Sep; 55(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 16948962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
