139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12908477)
1. An introduction to legal thought: four approaches to law and to the allocation of body parts.
Calabresi G
Stanford Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 55(6):2113-51. PubMed ID: 12908477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Do we own our bodies?
Calabresi G
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 10121879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Developments in the law. Medical technology and the law.
Harv Law Rev; 1990 May; 103(7):1519-676. PubMed ID: 10106697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Are we morally obligated to make gifts of our bodies?
Murray TH
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 10121877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Property, privacy, and the human body.
Rao R
Boston Univ Law Rev; 2000 Apr; 80(2):359-460. PubMed ID: 16523588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Privacy rights and abortion outing: a proposal for using common-law torts to protect abortion patients and staff.
Clapman A
Yale Law J; 2003 Apr; 112(6):1545-76. PubMed ID: 15046034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The trespasses of property law.
Wall J
J Med Ethics; 2014 Jan; 40(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 23842078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health care law.
Mayo TW
SMU Law Rev; 2003; 56(3):1767-82. PubMed ID: 12924424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The control of living body materials.
Dickens BM
Univ Tor Law J; 1977; 27(2):142-98. PubMed ID: 11660914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryonic law: a legal development.
Sojka LA
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1996 Oct; 81(10):32-5. PubMed ID: 10162092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries.
Andanda PA
J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18316458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
Shapiro AA
Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
Sunstein CR
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
Vanzi LM
N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon.
Hagen JD
America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The argument for property rights in body parts: scarcity of resources.
Douglas S
J Med Ethics; 2014 Jan; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 23043186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006) and constitutional civil rights in the United States.
Verheijde JL; Rady MY; McGregor JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 May; 37(5):1830; author reply 1830. PubMed ID: 19373069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
