76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12908676)
1. A cross-modal weapon focus effect: The influence of a weapon's presence on memory for auditory information.
Pickel KL; French TA; Betts JM
Memory; 2003 May; 11(3):277-92. PubMed ID: 12908676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unusualness and threat as possible causes of "weapon focus".
Pickel KL
Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):277-95. PubMed ID: 9709443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The weapon focus effect on memory for female versus male perpetrators.
Pickel KL
Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 19536689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: a study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory.
Parmentier FB; Maybery MT; Elsley J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20139445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eye closure reduces the cross-modal memory impairment caused by auditory distraction.
Perfect TJ; Andrade J; Eagan I
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1008-13. PubMed ID: 21417514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judging veracity impairs eyewitnesses' memory of a perpetrator.
Pickel KL; Kulig TC; Bauer HM
Memory; 2013; 21(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 23350799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Earwitness recall and identification: comparison of the cognitive interview and the structured interview.
Memon A; Yarmey AD
Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):797-807. PubMed ID: 10407887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The weapon focus effect is weaker with Black versus White male perpetrators.
Pickel KL; Sneyd DE
Memory; 2018 Jan; 26(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 28436249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influences of multiple memory systems on auditory mental image acuity.
Navarro Cebrian A; Janata P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3189-202. PubMed ID: 21117767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
Pickel KL
Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio-visual object processing.
Schmid C; Büchel C; Rose M
Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 21112404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceiving similarity and comprehending metaphor.
Marks LE; Hammeal RJ; Bornstein MH
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1987; 52(1):1-102. PubMed ID: 3431563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The co-witness misinformation effect: memory blends or memory compliance?
Skagerberg EM; Wright DB
Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 18432487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unconscious auditory information can prime visual word processing: a process-dissociation procedure study.
Lamy D; Mudrik L; Deouell LY
Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):688-98. PubMed ID: 18086535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
