These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12908762)

  • 1. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 12908762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative reinforcer rates and magnitudes do not control concurrent choice independently.
    Elliffe D; Davison M; Landon J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Sep; 90(2):169-85. PubMed ID: 18831124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zebrafish choice behavior is sensitive to reinforcer rate, immediacy, and magnitude ratios.
    Kuroda T; Ritchey CM; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Sep; 116(2):182-207. PubMed ID: 34223635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
    Landon J; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
    Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.