These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12908938)

  • 1. Comparison and evaluation of DRI methamphetamine, DRI ecstasy, Abuscreen ONLINE amphetamine, and a modified Abuscreen ONLINE amphetamine screening immunoassays for the detection of amphetamine (AMP), methamphetamine (MTH), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in human urine.
    Stout PR; Klette KL; Wiegand R
    J Anal Toxicol; 2003; 27(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 12908938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine concentrations in human urine samples and a comparison of the specificity of DRI amphetamines and Abuscreen online (KIMS) amphetamines screening immunoassays.
    Stout PR; Klette KL; Horn CK
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):160-4. PubMed ID: 14979364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance characteristics of selected immunoassays for preliminary test of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methamphetamine, and related drugs in urine specimens.
    Hsu J; Liu C; Liu CP; Tsay WI; Li JH; Lin DL; Liu RH
    J Anal Toxicol; 2003 Oct; 27(7):471-8. PubMed ID: 14607002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profiles of urine samples taken from Ecstasy users at Rave parties: analysis by immunoassays, HPLC, and GC-MS.
    Zhao H; Brenneisen R; Scholer A; McNally AJ; ElSohly MA; Murphy TP; Salamone SJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 2001; 25(4):258-69. PubMed ID: 11386639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Microgenics CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) and the Roche Abuscreen ONLINE opiate immunoassays for the detection of heroin use in forensic urine samples.
    Holler JM; Bosy TZ; Klette KL; Wiegand R; Jemionek J; Jacobs A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2004 Sep; 28(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 15516301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of use study for amphetamine (AMP), methamphetamine (MAMP), 3,4-methylenedioxy-amphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxy-ethylamphetamine (MDEA) in military entrance processing stations (MEPS) specimens.
    Klette KL; Kettle AR; Jamerson MH
    J Anal Toxicol; 2006 Jun; 30(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 16839469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confirmation of amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDA and MDMA in urine samples using disk solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after immunoassay screening.
    Huang Z; Zhang S
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2003 Jul; 792(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 12860031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three commercial amphetamine immunoassays for detection of methamphetamine, methylenedioxyamphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and methylenedioxyethylamphetamine.
    Ruangyuttikarn W; Moody DE
    J Anal Toxicol; 1988; 12(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 2903272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MDA-MDMA concentrations in urine specimens.
    Kunsman GW; Levine B; Kuhlman JJ; Jones RL; Hughes RO; Fujiyama CI; Smith ML
    J Anal Toxicol; 1996; 20(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 8934299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiation of amphetamine/methamphetamine and other cross-immunoreactive sympathomimetic amines in urine samples by serial dilution testing.
    Woodworth A; Saunders AN; Koenig JW; Moyer TP; Turk J; Dietzen DJ
    Clin Chem; 2006 Apr; 52(4):743-6. PubMed ID: 16455869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-positive amphetamine/ecstasy (MDMA/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) (CEDIA) and ecstasy (MDMA/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) (DRI) test results with fenofibrate.
    Kaplan YC; Erol A; Karadaş B
    Ther Drug Monit; 2012 Oct; 34(5):493-5. PubMed ID: 22972534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enantiomeric separation and quantitation of (+/-)-amphetamine, (+/-)-methamphetamine, (+/-)-MDA, (+/-)-MDMA, and (+/-)-MDEA in urine specimens by GC-EI-MS after derivatization with (R)-(-)- or (S)-(+)-alpha-methoxy-alpha-(trifluoromethy)phenylacetyl chloride (MTPA).
    Paul BD; Jemionek J; Lesser D; Jacobs A; Searles DA
    J Anal Toxicol; 2004 Sep; 28(6):449-55. PubMed ID: 15516295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous determination of amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) enantiomers by GC-MS.
    Hensley D; Cody JT
    J Anal Toxicol; 1999 Oct; 23(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 10517560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid analysis of amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDA, and MDMA in urine using solid-phase microextraction, direct on-fiber derivatization, and analysis by GC-MS.
    Jurado C; Giménez MP; Soriano T; Menéndez M; Repetto M
    J Anal Toxicol; 2000; 24(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10654563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid simultaneous determination of amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine in urine by solid-phase extraction and GC-MS: a method optimized for high-volume laboratories.
    Stout PR; Horn CK; Klette KL
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002; 26(5):253-61. PubMed ID: 12166811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of six immunoassays for the detection of amphetamines in urine.
    Verstraete AG; Heyden FV
    J Anal Toxicol; 2005; 29(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16105261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EMIT-d.a.u. monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay. II. Detection of methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA).
    Poklis A; Fitzgerald RL; Hall KV; Saady JJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 1993 Apr; 59(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 8099337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct injection LC-MS/MS method for identification and quantification of amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in urine drug testing.
    Andersson M; Gustavsson E; Stephanson N; Beck O
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2008 Jan; 861(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18088576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Roche Abuscreen ONLINE amphetamine immunoassay for screening of new amphetamine analogues.
    Lekskulchai V; Mokkhavesa C
    J Anal Toxicol; 2001 Sep; 25(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 11550823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of multiple internal standards: deuterated analogues of methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methylenedioxyamphetamine, methamphetamine, and amphetamine.
    Lin DL; Liu HC; Yin RM; Chen DT; Soong SJ; Liu RH
    J Anal Toxicol; 2004; 28(8):650-4. PubMed ID: 15538959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.