These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1290913)

  • 1. Effect of polishing burs and stones on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Ribeiro SA; do Nascimento TN; Centola AL; Teixeira LC; Campos SM
    Braz Dent J; 1992; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 1290913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the polishing technique at low or high speed on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Pedigoni Mde L; Centola AL; Froner IC; Turbino ML; Ribeiro SA
    Braz Dent J; 1991; 2(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1819356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
    Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A study of different polishing techniques for amalgams and glass-cermet cement by scanning electron microscope (SEM)].
    Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G; Argiri G
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 2518600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface treatment of mercury-free alloys.
    Geiger SB; Gurbatov D; Dariel MP; Eichmiller FC; Liberman R; Ratzker M
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
    Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of different techniques for finishing and polishing amalgam.
    Eide R; Tveit AB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1987 Jun; 45(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3475948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experimental research on the finishing and polishing of amalgam fillings].
    Staehle HJ; Rummler A
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 1866610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indentation creep behavior of a direct-filling silver alternative to amalgam.
    Xu HH; Liao H; Eichmiller FC
    J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 77(12):1991-8. PubMed ID: 9839787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rugosimetric analysis of amalgam restorations polished using different techniques.
    Pereira MA; Centola AL; do Nascimento TN; Turbino ML
    Braz Dent J; 1998; 9(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 10219120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.