188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12909537)
1. Field comparison of inhalable and total dust samplers for assessing airborne dust in swine confinement barns.
Predicala BZ; Maghirang RG
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 12909537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
Tatum VL; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx DC
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
Thorpe A; Walsh PT
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
Thorpe A
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of worker exposure to inhalable and total dust, inorganic arsenic, and borates using two types of particulate sampling assemblies in a borate mining and processing facility.
Katchen MA; Puhalovich VA; Swaroop R; Culver BD
Biol Trace Elem Res; 1998; 66(1-3):59-64. PubMed ID: 10050908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cotton dust and endotoxin levels in three Shanghai textile factories: a comparison of samplers.
Astrakianakis G; Seixas N; Camp J; Smith TJ; Bartlett K; Checkoway H
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Aug; 3(8):418-27. PubMed ID: 16862712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Field comparison of two inhalable samplers used in Italy to measure the wood dust exposure.
Campopiano A; Basili F; Angelosanto F; Cannizzaro A; Olori A; Ramires D; Iannò A; Angelici L
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2016 Apr; 22(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27373902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intersampler field comparison of Respicon(R), IOM, and closed-face 25-mm personal aerosol samplers during primary production of aluminium.
Skaugset NP; Ellingsen DG; Notø H; Jordbekken L; Thomassen Y
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):1054-64. PubMed ID: 23792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure to inhalable flour dust in Canadian flour mills.
Karpinski EA
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1022-30. PubMed ID: 14612299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.
Anthony TR; Cai C; Mehaffy J; Sleeth D; Volckens J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 27792469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field performance of the RespiCon for size-selective sampling of industrial wood processing dust.
Rando R; Poovey H; Mokadam D; Brisolara J; Glindmeyer H
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 15788383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Site comparison of selected aerosol samplers in the wood industry.
Kauffer E; Wrobel R; Görner P; Rott C; Grzebyk M; Simon X; Witschger O
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 20044585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries.
Harper M; Muller BS
J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 12400909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
