These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12910459)

  • 1. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
    Dominy BN; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reduced protein model with accurate native-structure identification ability.
    Betancourt MR
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):889-907. PubMed ID: 14635131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
    Lee MC; Duan Y
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new pairwise folding potential based on improved decoy generation and side-chain packing.
    Loose C; Klepeis JL; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):303-14. PubMed ID: 14696192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
    Liu S; Zhang C; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15162489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions.
    Forrest LR; Woolf TB
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):492-509. PubMed ID: 12910450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys.
    Rajgaria R; McAllister SR; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):950-70. PubMed ID: 17847088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
    Tsai J; Bonneau R; Morozov AV; Kuhlman B; Rohl CA; Baker D
    Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel high resolution Calpha--Calpha distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set.
    Rajgaria R; McAllister SR; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):726-41. PubMed ID: 16981202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure.
    Park BH; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 249(2):493-507. PubMed ID: 7783205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A pair-to-pair amino acids substitution matrix and its applications for protein structure prediction.
    Eyal E; Frenkel-Morgenstern M; Sobolev V; Pietrokovski S
    Proteins; 2007 Apr; 67(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 17243158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft energy function and generic evolutionary method for discriminating native from nonnative protein conformations.
    Chiu YY; Hwang JK; Yang JM
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Jul; 29(9):1364-73. PubMed ID: 18181137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
    Wroblewska L; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial profiling of protein hydrophobicity: native vs. decoy structures.
    Zhou R; Silverman BD; Royyuru AK; Athma P
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):561-72. PubMed ID: 12910456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.
    Lin MS; Fawzi NL; Head-Gordon T
    Structure; 2007 Jun; 15(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 17562319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient identification of near-native conformations in ab initio protein structure prediction using structural profiles.
    Wolff K; Vendruscolo M; Porto M
    Proteins; 2010 Feb; 78(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 19701942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ProVal: a protein-scoring function for the selection of native and near-native folds.
    Berglund A; Head RD; Welsh EA; Marshall GR
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 14696191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.