259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12911106)
1. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects.
Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.
Snodgrass JG; Vanderwart M
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Mar; 6(2):174-215. PubMed ID: 7373248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set.
Snodgrass JG; Corwin J
Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 3211683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Category-specific effects on the identification of non-manipulable objects.
McMullen PA; Purdy KS
Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 16860450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification.
Filliter JH; McMullen PA; Westwood D
Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15629216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: consequences for categorization and naming.
Gale TM; Laws KR; Foley K
Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16377049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Action and object processing in aphasia: from nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability.
Arévalo A; Perani D; Cappa SF; Butler A; Bates E; Dronkers N
Brain Lang; 2007 Jan; 100(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 16949143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects.
Salmon JP; McMullen PA; Filliter JH
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 20160288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of surface characteristics and style of production on naming and verification of pictorial stimuli.
Brodie EE; Wallace AM; Sharrat B
Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(4):517-45. PubMed ID: 1793125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ground side of an object: perceived as shapeless yet processed for semantics.
Sanguinetti JL; Allen JJ; Peterson MA
Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 24220627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Probing sensory and associative semantics for animals and objects in normal subjects.
Laws KR; Humber SA; Ramsey DJ; McCarthy RA
Memory; 1995; 3(3-4):397-408. PubMed ID: 8574871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pigeons see correspondence between objects and their pictures.
Spetch ML; Friedman A
Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):966-72. PubMed ID: 17176429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.
Yee E; Sedivy JC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16478336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new set of 84 colored nonobjects.
Ankerstein CA; Varley RA; Cowell PE
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):172-176. PubMed ID: 19182137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Priorities in children's expectations about object label reference: form over color.
Baldwin DA
Child Dev; 1989 Dec; 60(6):1291-306. PubMed ID: 2612242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reexamining the Snodgrass and Corwin 1988 picture identification norms.
Koch C; Abbey L; Schmidt S
Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):763-9. PubMed ID: 8668433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations.
Gronau N; Neta M; Bar M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):371-88. PubMed ID: 18004950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: norms for name agreement, age of acquisition, and visual complexity.
Dimitropoulou M; Duñabeitia JA; Blitsas P; Carreiras M
Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):584-9. PubMed ID: 19363201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.
Rossion B; Pourtois G
Perception; 2004; 33(2):217-36. PubMed ID: 15109163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural processing and category-specific deficits.
Marques JF; Raposo A; Almeida J
Cortex; 2013 Jan; 49(1):266-75. PubMed ID: 22113188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
