These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12911359)

  • 21. Evaluation of the disposable Vital View laryngoscope apparatus.
    Asai T; Uchiyama Y; Yamamoto K; Johmura S; Shingu K
    Anaesthesia; 2001 Apr; 56(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 11284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the forces applied to a manikin during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope and Macintosh laryngoscopes.
    Russell T; Lee C; Firat M; Cooper RM
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2011 Nov; 39(6):1098-102. PubMed ID: 22165365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Single-use laryngoscope blade assessment].
    Fourneret-Vivier A; Rousseau A; Shum J; Frenea S; Fargnoli JM; Mallaret MR
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2004 Jul; 23(7):694-9. PubMed ID: 15324957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Disposable laryngoscope intubation to reduce equipment failure in an emergency out of OR setting - a quality control case study.
    Simmons CG; Eckle T; Rogers D; Williams JD; Brainard JC
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):16. PubMed ID: 36627551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of single use laryngoscopy equipment on illumination for tracheal intubation.
    Anderson KJ; Bhandal N
    Anaesthesia; 2002 Aug; 57(8):773-7. PubMed ID: 12133090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with a Glidescope video laryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomised controlled trial.
    Cordovani D; Russell T; Wee W; Suen A; Cooper RM
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Mar; 36(3):221-226. PubMed ID: 30308524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.
    McCoy EP; Mirakhur RK; Rafferty C; Bunting H; Austin BA
    Anaesthesia; 1996 Oct; 51(10):912-5. PubMed ID: 8984862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Single-use and reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomized controlled trial in elective surgery].
    Guerci P; Vial F; Bouaziz H
    Can J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 59(1):114-5. PubMed ID: 21997227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical testing of the deflection and ultimate strength of metal and plastic disposable laryngoscope blades.
    Pullela RP; Brousseau PA; Valliant EM; Milne AD
    Can J Anaesth; 2022 Mar; 69(3):393-395. PubMed ID: 34910288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia.
    Amour J; Marmion F; Birenbaum A; Nicolas-Robin A; Coriat P; Riou B; Langeron O
    Anesthesiology; 2006 Jan; 104(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16394691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Forces generated by Macintosh and GlideScope® laryngoscopes in four airway-training manikins.
    Lee C; Russell T; Firat M; Cooper RM
    Anaesthesia; 2013 May; 68(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 23573844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Infection control practices of laryngoscope blades: a review of the literature.
    Machan MD
    AANA J; 2012 Aug; 80(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 23251996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In reply: Mechanical testing of the deflection and ultimate strength of metal and plastic disposable laryngoscope blades.
    Choi J; Song Y; Cho Y; Lim TH
    Can J Anaesth; 2022 Mar; 69(3):396-397. PubMed ID: 34918198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A response to 'lymphocyte contamination of laryngoscope blades--a possible vector for transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease'.
    Barnett N; Hanafiah Z
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Nov; 60(11):1158-9; author reply 1159. PubMed ID: 16229718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Disposable or reusable blade in laryngoscopy: what choice in Languedoc-Roussillon, France?
    Sleth JC; Servais R; Saizy C; Javitary W; Lafforgue E
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Apr; 110(4):656-7. PubMed ID: 23508492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of simulated difficult intubation with multiple-use and single-use bougies in a manikin.
    Annamaneni R; Hodzovic I; Wilkes AR; Latto IP
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Jan; 58(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12492669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients.
    Asai T; Matsumoto S; Fujise K; Johmura S; Shingu K
    Br J Anaesth; 2003 Apr; 90(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 12644417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the strength of various disposable videolaryngoscope blades.
    Choi J; Song Y; Lee H; Cho Y; Han TH; Lim TH
    Can J Anaesth; 2021 Nov; 68(11):1651-1658. PubMed ID: 34405354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades.
    Jones RM; Jones PL; Gildersleve CD; Hall JE; Harding LJ; Chawathe MS
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Oct; 59(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 15488063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope-a manikin study.
    Aleksandrowicz D; Gaszyński T
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):907-913. PubMed ID: 29260450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.