139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12913386)
1. DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey.
Duvarci I; Varan A; Coşkunol H; Ersoy MA
J Gambl Stud; 1997; 13(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 12913386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Descriptive features of Turkish pathological gamblers.
Duvarci I; Varan A
Scand J Psychol; 2000 Sep; 41(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 11041308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling.
Cox BJ; Enns MW; Michaud V
Can J Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 49(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 15147024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Stinchfield R
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.
Haddad P; Roukoz R; Akel M; Hallit S
BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 35105378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.
Lesieur HR; Blume SB
Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Sep; 144(9):1184-8. PubMed ID: 3631315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of Treatment Seeking Finnish Pathological Gamblers: Baseline Data from a Treatment Study.
Lahti T; Halme J; Pankakoski M; Sinclair D; Alho H
Int J Ment Health Addict; 2013 Jun; 11(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 23710159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
Kido M; Shimazaki T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric Properties of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents in Chinese Adolescent Gamblers.
Zhou H; Chen JH; Ling H; Tong KK; Wu AMS
Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1605182. PubMed ID: 36466009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents and adults?
Ladouceur R; Bouchard C; Rhéaume N; Jacques C; Ferland F; Leblond J; Walker M
J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 14634319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers.
Strong DR; Breen RB; Lesieur HR; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2003 Oct; 28(8):1465-72. PubMed ID: 14512069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Daily Tobacco Smoking in Treatment-Seeking Pathological Gamblers: Clinical Correlates and Co-occurring Psychiatric Disorders.
Grant JE; Kim SW; Odlaug BL; Potenza MN
J Addict Med; 2008; 2(4):178-84. PubMed ID: 19690628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation.
Hodgins DC
Addict Behav; 2004 Nov; 29(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 15451138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
