307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12913728)
1. Robotic assisted laparoscopic sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy: initial experience.
Kaouk JH; Desai MM; Abreu SC; Papay F; Gill IS
J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):909-12. PubMed ID: 12913728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interposition of sural nerve restores function of cavernous nerves resected during radical prostatectomy.
Kim ED; Scardino PT; Hampel O; Mills NL; Wheeler TM; Nath RK
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):188-92. PubMed ID: 10037395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cavernous nerve graft reconstruction during radical prostatectomy or radical cystectomy: safe and technically feasible.
Anastasiadis AG; Benson MC; Rosenwasser MP; Salomon L; El-Rashidy H; Ghafar MA; McKiernan JM; Burchardt M; Shabsigh R
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2003; 6(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12664067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique.
Menon M; Tewari A; Peabody J;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2289-92. PubMed ID: 12771773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sural nerve grafting in robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: interim report.
Mikhail AA; Song DH; Zorn KC; Orvieto MA; Taxy JB; Lin SP; Mendiola FP; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP
J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1547-51. PubMed ID: 18044998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report.
Kaouk JH; Goel RK; Haber GP; Crouzet S; Stein RJ
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 18778353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sural nerve graft during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience.
Turk IA; Deger S; Morgan WR; Davis JW; Schellhammer PF; Loening SA
Urol Oncol; 2002; 7(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 12644215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nerve grafting at the time of radical prostatectomy: should we be doing it?
Mancuso P; Rashid P
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):859-63. PubMed ID: 18959637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Guru KA; Perlmutter AE; Butt ZM; Peabody JO
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):4000-3. PubMed ID: 18405449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Bernstein AJ; Gofrit ON; Shikanov SA; Mikhail AA; Song DH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):1005-12. PubMed ID: 18419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy: 3-year longitudinal study.
Namiki S; Saito S; Nakagawa H; Sanada T; Yamada A; Arai Y
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):212-6; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 17499797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year outcome of unilateral sural nerve interposition graft after radical prostatectomy.
Sim HG; Kliot M; Lange PH; Ellis WJ; Takayama TK; Yang CC
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1290-4. PubMed ID: 17141842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience.
Finley DS; Rodriguez E; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1296-9; discussion 1299-300. PubMed ID: 17698133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
