These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1291392)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of four anterior composite resins over five years.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jul; 8(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 1291392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 1290611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison of three anterior restorative resins at 3 years.
    Davis RD; Mayhew RB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 112(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 2940280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
    Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year assessment of anterior resin restorations inserted with two acid-etch restorative procedures.
    Qvist V; Ström C; Thylstrup A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Aug; 93(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 3898343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incisal angle adhesive resins: a 5-year clinical survey of two materials.
    Smales RJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Jan; 10(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 6219194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites.
    Gresnigt MM; Kalk W; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):766-75. PubMed ID: 22664565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?
    Baldissera RA; Corrêa MB; Schuch HS; Collares K; Nascimento GG; Jardim PS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1027-35. PubMed ID: 24001506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultraviolet-light cured composite-resin restorations on fractured incisor teeth: an evaluation after 10-12 years.
    Stokes AN; Robb NT; Shorter HR
    N Z Dent J; 1986 Jan; 82(367):15-7. PubMed ID: 2935752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; Healy A; Mark B; McBirnie R; Osborne-Smith KL
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 12066649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2015 May; 31(5):481-95. PubMed ID: 25773188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II composite resin restorations: a three-year clinical study of six different posterior composites.
    Lundin SA; Andersson B; Koch G; Rasmusson CG
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 2255989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Class I Restorations in Posterior Teeth. Effects of Two Adhesive Systems.
    Sundfeld RH; Machado LS; Pita DS; Franco LM; Sundfeld D; Sundefeld ML; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 27700126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.