137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12914618)
21. Long-term pacing in heart transplant recipients is usually unnecessary.
Scott CD; Omar I; McComb JM; Dark JH; Bexton RS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1792-6. PubMed ID: 1721177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The potential utility of sensor-driven pacing in DDD pacemakers.
Leman RB; White JK; Kratz JM; Gillette PC
Am Heart J; 1989 Nov; 118(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 2816703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Respiratory-dependent atrial pacing, management of sinus node disease.
Rognoni G; Bolognese L; Aina F; Occhetta E; Magnani A; Rossi P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1853-9. PubMed ID: 2463558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Fong PC; Li JP; Chung FL
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1504-14. PubMed ID: 1383962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.
Nitardy A; Langreck H; Dietz R; Stockburger M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automatic adaptation of the basic pacing rate in response to minute ventilation. Chorum French Investigational Group.
Limousin M; Pioger G; Bonnet JL; Geroux L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1405-9. PubMed ID: 9670184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term follow-up of DDDR closed-loop cardiac pacing for the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope.
Bortnik M; Occhetta E; Dell'Era G; Secco GG; Degiovanni A; Plebani L; Marino P
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2012 Apr; 13(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 22367575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The DDDR closed loop stimulation for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: results from the INVASY prospective feasibility registry.
Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Vassanelli C;
Europace; 2003 Apr; 5(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12633640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Activity-based pacing: comparison of a device using an accelerometer versus a piezoelectric crystal.
Bacharach DW; Hilden TS; Millerhagen JO; Westrum BL; Kelly JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Feb; 15(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 1372418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rate hysteresis pacing: how valuable is it? A comparison of the stimulation rates of 70 and 50 beats per minute and rate hysteresis in patients with sinus node disease.
Rosenqvist M; Vallin HO; Edhag KO
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 May; 7(3 Pt 1):332-40. PubMed ID: 6204283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy and safety of ventricular rate responsive pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block.
Ragonese P; Guccione P; Drago F; Turchetta A; Calzolari A; Formigari R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):603-10. PubMed ID: 7516544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical observations with long-term atrial pacing.
Böhm A; Pintér A; Székely A; Préda I
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):246-9. PubMed ID: 9474681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What's the price to be paid for rate response: AV sequential versus ventricular pacing?
Markewitz A; Hemmer W
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1782-6. PubMed ID: 1721175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers.
McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical experience with Sensolog 703: a new activity sensing rate responsive pacemaker.
Lau CP; Tse WS; Camm AJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1444-55. PubMed ID: 2462222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dual chamber rate responsive pacing system driven by contractility: final assessment after 1-year follow-up. The European PEA Clinical Investigation Group.
Clémenty J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2192-7. PubMed ID: 9825317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term hemodynamic benefit of atrial synchronization with A2A2D or A2A2T pacing in sinus node syndrome after orthotopic heart transplantation.
Nägele H; Döring V; Kalmár P; Schmidek G; Stubbe HH; Rödiger W
J Heart Lung Transplant; 1998 Sep; 17(9):906-12. PubMed ID: 9773864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a new pacing algorithm to prevent rapid tracking of atrial tachyarrhythmias.
Kamalvand K; Kotsakis A; Tan K; Bucknall C; Sulke N
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1714-8. PubMed ID: 8945029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new motion responsive pacemaker: first clinical experience with an acceleration sensor pacemaker.
Borst U; Siekmeyer G; Maisch B; Kaye S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1809-14. PubMed ID: 1279552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
