These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12916023)

  • 1. Optimal two-stage genotyping in population-based association studies.
    Satagopan JM; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 25(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 12916023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal DNA pooling-based two-stage designs in case-control association studies.
    Zhao Y; Wang S
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 18931509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal robust two-stage designs for genome-wide association studies.
    Nguyen TT; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 73(Pt 6):638-51. PubMed ID: 19839987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-stage designs for gene-disease association studies with sample size constraints.
    Satagopan JM; Venkatraman ES; Begg CB
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 15339280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimum two-stage designs in case-control association studies using false discovery rate.
    Kuchiba A; Tanaka NY; Ohashi Y
    J Hum Genet; 2006; 51(12):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 17003959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal designs for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):776-88. PubMed ID: 17549752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans.
    Wang H; Thomas DC; Pe'er I; Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 16607626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-stage designs in case-control association analysis.
    Zuo Y; Zou G; Zhao H
    Genetics; 2006 Jul; 173(3):1747-60. PubMed ID: 16624925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prioritize and select SNPs for association studies with multi-stage designs.
    Li J
    J Comput Biol; 2008 Apr; 15(3):241-57. PubMed ID: 18352819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A genome-wide scan of 1842 DNA markers for allelic associations with general cognitive ability: a five-stage design using DNA pooling and extreme selected groups.
    Plomin R; Hill L; Craig IW; McGuffin P; Purcell S; Sham P; Lubinski D; Thompson LA; Fisher PJ; Turic D; Owen MJ
    Behav Genet; 2001 Nov; 31(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 11838529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies for genome-wide association studies: optimization of study designs by the stepwise focusing method.
    Saito A; Kamatani N
    J Hum Genet; 2002; 47(7):360-5. PubMed ID: 12111370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis using pairs of affected relatives.
    Elston RC; Guo X; Williams LV
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(6):535-58. PubMed ID: 8968713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-stage designs for gene-disease association studies.
    Satagopan JM; Verbel DA; Venkatraman ES; Offit KE; Begg CB
    Biometrics; 2002 Mar; 58(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 11890312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Nat Genet; 2006 Feb; 38(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 16415888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A two-stage design for multiple testing in large-scale association studies.
    Wen SH; Tzeng JY; Kao JT; Hsiao CK
    J Hum Genet; 2006; 51(6):523-532. PubMed ID: 16691321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design considerations for genetic linkage and association studies.
    Nsengimana J; Bishop DT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():237-62. PubMed ID: 22307702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association.
    McIntyre LM; Martin ER; Simonsen KL; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power for genetic association studies with random allele frequencies and genotype distributions.
    Ambrosius WT; Lange EM; Langefeld CD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Apr; 74(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 15024689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporation of genetic model parameters for cost-effective designs of genetic association studies using DNA pooling.
    Ji F; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Mendell NR; Gordon D
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Jul; 8():238. PubMed ID: 17634103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.