These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12917283)

  • 1. Feasibility of local CT of dental tissues.
    van Daatselaar AN; Dunn SM; Spoelder HJ; Germans DM; Renambot L; Bal HE; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 12917283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of mandibles with microfocus x-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use.
    Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Mitsuya S; Kamemoto H; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 15101596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of a new software in eliminating the angulation errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Göğüş S; Tuğsel Z; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):484-9. PubMed ID: 18033945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of mandibular positioning on preimplant site measurement of the mandible in reformatted CT.
    Kim KD; Jeong HG; Choi SH; Hwang EH; Park CS
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Apr; 23(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 12710821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visibility of trabecular structures in oral radiographs.
    Couture RA; Whiting BR; Hildebolt CF; Dixon DA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Dec; 96(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 14676770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro assessment of cone beam local computed tomography for proximal caries detection.
    Kalathingal SM; Mol A; Tyndall DA; Caplan DJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Nov; 104(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 17188528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of caries with local CT.
    van Daatselaar AN; Tyndall DA; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 13679354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Morant RD; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 11174606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of a generalized TACT algorithm for arbitrary source-object distances.
    Linnenbrügger NI; Webber RL; Lehmann TM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 12087442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
    Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The computer-assisted processing of CT data in planning endosseous implantation interventions].
    Schmitt W; Genzel K; Klein HM
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):238-40. PubMed ID: 1550920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Diagnostic possibilities of digital volume tomography].
    Lemkamp M; Filippi A; Berndt D; Lambrecht JT
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 16875261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of number of projections on image quality of local CT.
    van Daatselaar AN; van der Stelt PF; Weenen J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Nov; 33(6):361-9. PubMed ID: 15665229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
    Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum number of basis projections for caries detection with local CT.
    van Daatselaar AN; Tyndall DA; Verheij H; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Nov; 33(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 15665228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional computer tomography (CT) in the evaluation of placement for dental implants.
    Lee CY
    Hawaii Dent J; 1996; 27(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 11908285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.