327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12918628)
1. Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55-74-year-old first-time hearing aid users.
Davis A
Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S39-52. PubMed ID: 12918628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit from spatial separation of multiple talkers in bilateral hearing-aid users: Effects of hearing loss, age, and cognition.
Neher T; Behrens T; Carlile S; Jin C; Kragelund L; Petersen AS; Schaik Av
Int J Audiol; 2009 Nov; 48(11):758-74. PubMed ID: 19951144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss--a review.
Arlinger S
Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S17-20. PubMed ID: 12918624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory rehabilitation of older people from the general population--the Leiden 85-plus study.
Gussekloo J; de Bont LE; von Faber M; Eekhof JA; de Laat JA; Hulshof JH; van Dongen E; Westendorp RG
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jul; 53(492):536-40. PubMed ID: 14694666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.
Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
