These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12918911)

  • 41. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
    van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Choice of in vivo versus idealized velocity boundary conditions influences physiologically relevant flow patterns in a subject-specific simulation of flow in the human carotid bifurcation.
    Wake AK; Oshinski JN; Tannenbaum AR; Giddens DP
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):021013. PubMed ID: 19102572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
    Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
    Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Three-dimensional numerical analysis of pulsatile flow and wall shear stress in the carotid artery bifurcation.
    Perktold K; Resch M; Peter RO
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(6):409-20. PubMed ID: 1856241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Characterization of the atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation using MRI, finite element modeling, and histology.
    Kaazempur-Mofrad MR; Isasi AG; Younis HF; Chan RC; Hinton DP; Sukhova G; LaMuraglia GM; Lee RT; Kamm RD
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 32(7):932-46. PubMed ID: 15298431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Referenceless phase velocity mapping using balanced SSFP.
    Nielsen JF; Nayak KS
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 19230016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Calculation of the magnetization distribution for fluid flow in curved vessels.
    Jou LD; van Tyen R; Berger SA; Saloner D
    Magn Reson Med; 1996 Apr; 35(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 8992209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique. In vitro and in vivo validation.
    Evans AJ; Iwai F; Grist TA; Sostman HD; Hedlund LW; Spritzer CE; Negro-Vilar R; Beam CA; Pelc NJ
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Feb; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 8444566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Blood flow modeling in carotid arteries with computational fluid dynamics and MR imaging.
    Cebral JR; Yim PJ; Löhner R; Soto O; Choyke PL
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1286-99. PubMed ID: 12449361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Feasibility of Ultrasound-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics as a Mitral Valve Regurgitation Quantification Technique: Comparison with 2-D and 3-D Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area-Based Methods.
    Jamil M; Ahmad O; Poh KK; Yap CH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1314-1330. PubMed ID: 28434658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Velocity Measurement in Carotid Artery: Quantitative Comparison of Time-Resolved 3D Phase-Contrast MRI and Image-based Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Sarrami-Foroushani A; Nasr Esfahany M; Nasiraei Moghaddam A; Saligheh Rad H; Firouznia K; Shakiba M; Ghanaati H; Wilkinson ID; Frangi AF
    Iran J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 12(4):e18286. PubMed ID: 26793288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Gated 4D Flow Cardiac MR Image Acquisitions in the Carotid Bifurcation.
    Hurd ER; Han M; Mendes JK; Hadley JR; Johnson CR; DiBella EVR; Oshinski JN; Timmins LH
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Feb; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 35618870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reproducibility study of magnetic resonance image-based computational fluid dynamics prediction of carotid bifurcation flow.
    Glor FP; Long Q; Hughes AD; Augst AD; Ariff B; Thom SA; Verdonck PR; Xu XY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 31(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 12627821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. 3D MRI-based multicomponent FSI models for atherosclerotic plaques.
    Tang D; Yang C; Zheng J; Woodard PK; Sicard GA; Saffitz JE; Yuan C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 32(7):947-60. PubMed ID: 15298432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Regularization of flow streamlines in multislice phase-contrast MR imaging.
    Fatouraee N; Amini AA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jun; 22(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 12872945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. 3D dynamical ultrasonic model of pulsating vessel walls.
    Balocco S; Basset O; Courbebaisse G; Delachartre P; Tortoli P; Cachard C
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e179-83. PubMed ID: 16857232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accelerated sequences of 4D flow MRI using GRAPPA and compressed sensing: A comparison against conventional MRI and computational fluid dynamics.
    Garreau M; Puiseux T; Toupin S; Giese D; Mendez S; Nicoud F; Moreno R
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Dec; 88(6):2432-2446. PubMed ID: 36005271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Inlet conditions for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation: is it reasonable to assume fully developed flow?
    Moyle KR; Antiga L; Steinman DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 16706586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta.
    Goubergrits L; Riesenkampff E; Yevtushenko P; Schaller J; Kertzscher U; Hennemuth A; Berger F; Schubert S; Kuehne T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 24723299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.