BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12920672)

  • 1. [Timeliness of informing the patient. Decision of the Federal Court, 3/25/2003 -VI ZR 131/02].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Aug; 128(33):1728-9. PubMed ID: 12920672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Timeliness of patient information in ambulatory surgery. Decision by the BGH (Federal High Court) of 6-14-1994].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1995 Feb; 120(5):151-2. PubMed ID: 7843034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Acceptability of pre-formulated consent forms for internal autopsy (autopsy consent) in hospital admission contracts. Decision of the Federal court 31 May 1990 on revision of the regulation of the Koblenz court 15 September 1989].
    Künzel R
    Pathologe; 1990 Nov; 11(6):319-21. PubMed ID: 2290788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Prevention of thrombosis with the walking cast--patient education regarding risks and treatment alternatives. Decision of the federal court 21 November 1995--VI ZR 329/94].
    Andreas M; Debong B
    Chirurg; 1997 Feb; 68(2):Suppl 53-4. PubMed ID: 9156974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The timing of the patient being informed. The judgement of the Federal Supreme Court of 7 April 1992].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1992 Oct; 117(42):1611-3. PubMed ID: 1396159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Substitution in the case of the inability of the chosen chief medical officer to perform medical treatment. Decision of the Federal Supreme Court on December 20, 2007].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Aug; 133(33):1696-7. PubMed ID: 18686213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Sale of the practice and patient records. Federal court: leaving patient records is only allowed with patient consent].
    Koch BF
    Chirurg; 1993 Feb; 64(2):suppl 32-3. PubMed ID: 8462345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Legal evaluation of an autopsy clause for hospital circumstances, which provides conflict resolution. A decision by the Koblenz Federal Court, 15 September 1989].
    Künzel R
    Pathologe; 1990 Mar; 11(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 2330350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The physician's duty to explain the possibility of damage to the ureter during abdominal hysterectomy].
    Schlund GH
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Nov; 44(11):758-9. PubMed ID: 6569012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Revocation of consent, responsibility in the ordering and execution of injections--decision of the Federal Court on 18 March 1980].
    Weissauer W
    Chirurg; 1980 Oct; 51(10):155-7. PubMed ID: 7438845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent: court viewpoints and medical decision making.
    Mazur DJ
    Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 3773652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Provision of information to patients. Legal and humanitarian requirements].
    Schara J; Brandt L
    Urologe A; 2008 Aug; 47(8):1009-16; quiz 1017-8. PubMed ID: 18682871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Obligatory informed consent on the risks to the accommodation ability of the eye after the implantation of an artificial lens].
    Riemer M
    Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jan; 104(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 17123049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Controversial judgment in the Dortmund federal court. Is patient education superfluous when everything is written down in the package insert?].
    Rigizahn EF
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Jul; 142(28-29):48-9. PubMed ID: 10959164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [BGH VI ZR 157/08--when can inadequate therapy and prognosis education be a major treatment error?].
    Thiede A
    Zentralbl Chir; 2010 Feb; 135(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 20162499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Provision of information to patients. Legal and humanitarian requirements].
    Schara J; Brandt L
    Orthopade; 2008 Aug; 37(8):793-800; quiz 801-2. PubMed ID: 18688671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Surgery in children: must both parents give consent? General regulations of the federal court].
    Fortschr Med; 1989 Oct; 107(29):98-9. PubMed ID: 2807124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Connection of an external clearing house in the private liquidation of official clinical directors. Decision of the Administrative Court of Frankfurt am Main of 07-19-1999].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Jan; 125(1-2):26-7. PubMed ID: 10650822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Preventable damage to the dura in radical removal of polypoid mucosa in the area of the ethmoid bone and cranial base; on the extent of the physician's responsibility for patient education before undertaking surgery. Decision of the Braunschweig federal court 23 May 1986--1 0 389/83--(legal standard)].
    Wienke A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 7755862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In the court it is often the deciding question: how thoroughly was the patient informed?].
    Schmidt K
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2002 Oct; 144(40):46. PubMed ID: 12440295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.